- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- world@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Good! Use trains.
Please let me know when the bullet train across the Atlantic and Pacific gets finished.
If oil shortage is severe enough and long lasting, we might see passenger ships coming back for transatlantic travel. How badly do you need to cross the atlantic?
My family lives a 15 hour flight away, I guess fuck me for not being born in Europe, I should just go back home permanently.
Based on what I know of cruise ships, I would bet that an ocean liner across the Atlantic wood burn even more fuel than a plane for the same number of people.
Rough calculation indicates that it would take about 3,000 gallons of fuel per person to go across the Atlantic.
I’d be interested into some data on this topic.
My undersranding is plane is one of the most polluting mode of transportation, all things being equal. It probably vary a lot depending on the specific ship/plane, route, …
Data from the UK’s Department for Energy Securityand Net Zero (2022) shows the carbon footprint is 8x higher for short/long-haul fight than for ferry. (CO2eq per passenger-km). Carbon footprint is strongly coupled with fuel consumption. It’s not quite the same, but I’d expect the ratio to be roughly the same.
It looks like cruise ships [are significantly worse](epn07501.pdf https://share.google/fD7gRD431iLtVZbUU) than airplanes. About four times more fuel.
Do you really need to ne there or would s call be enough?
Well my mother who’s in her 80’s lives 16,000 km so fuck me if she gets sick.
Ok? So the answer would be “No, a call wouldn’t be enough” in your case? Why do you get bent out of shape over that?
Sign me up, but only if it involves duck trains. It’s like a bunch of limo duck boats with couplings. Perhaps hydrofoils—high efficiency, relatively low load—could be a good fit. I would ride on a solar duckfoil.
Why would an European need to cross the Pacific? Asia is reachable by land.
Will online meetings and trains become relevant again?
And steel beams!
One can only hope so!
6 weeks from now I want to start my vacation 💀
Vacations doesn’t require jet fuel.
Relatively few people in the world visit the other side of the world by plane. For our sake it should remain a rare occurrence. For most vacations, there’s plenty of places that one can reach by train and bus.
If your area has shitty train infrastructure or too few bus lanes, I’m sorry, you may want to have a close look at where your taxes are going.
For someone who doesn’t know shit about my vacation, you seems to have quite many words to spare ;+)
Right, I know nothing except it seems to involve jet fuel. This is a general comment on vacations by plane, don’t take it personally.
IMHO: this only accelerated the inevitable. If you look at the airline industry, you will ask yourself how the hell can a flight cost 30 to 60 € in one direction? Well answer is in my opinion it can’t. No one can convince me that the pilot, the crew, the ground services, the fuel, the maintenance and the overflight services are cheap enough for this to make sense in a 200 people aeroplane. So I think this industry has been in a race to the bottom for quite some time now and basically they just wait to see who’s left to hold the bag after that.
Maybe then we can finally start to fly less…
Oil reaches Europe and there are refineries, which can produce more jet fuel…
Imagine all flights being grounded due to lack of fuel and trains suddenly becoming important. Germany is going to be so fucked…
The upside will be that people will spend money in the local economy instead of flying abroad and spending money there.
Flights within Germany where never popular. People would rather use the car, because it’s mostly cheaper and must of the time faster and more reliable than the train.