• hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    What’s ironic is that the big opposition from the GOP to ObamaCare was this ludicrous idea of “Death Panels” weighing human life against budgets.

    And yet, when the panels are a dictatorial insurance algorithm, where is that classic 2009-2010 outrage?

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      The panels are often just an automated script that always replies with Denied the first time too, since people sometimes dont fight it.

    • rwtwm@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      You probably already know but, those arguments aren’t why the GOP were outraged. It’s what they thought would be most likely to get the public outraged.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yes, you can blame the GOP for defunding education as well.

          (I have exactly zero love for the Zionazi-owned Dems either but I’m not aware of them ever defunding education)

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Or discriminating against gays, or cutting food stamps, or invading Greenland, or storing nuclear secrets in bathrooms, or…

            • 7101334@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              I do recall them being unabashedly genocidal in Palestine though, so I’m not exactly in a rush to give them credit for less-than-the-bare-minimum.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                That’s table stakes in the US unfortunately. There’s no option for “no genocide”, you need a complete reform of the electoral system (basically anything newer than 18th century will do) and then some new political parties. But since that is wishful thinking at the moment, the lesser of two evils will do.

                • 7101334@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  There’s no option for “no genocide”

                  Weird, I was able to find one.

                  the lesser of two evils will do.

                  “genocide is the lesser of two evils” is exactly where this mentality has gotten you. You may be compromised enough to sign your name off on that. I am not and never will be.

        • hateisreality@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          The public is way less intelligent than “dumb as fuck” hopefully we can get there on the way to marginally dumb. But I doubt it

            • OpenStars@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              That’s not true

              We shall see, only time will tell (though it’s interesting that any sitting President is allowed to legally assassinate anyone they want with virtually no oversight that we are told of).

              a dangerous cop out

              Fair.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Whenever an economic argument is invoked to justify for or against doing something, it’s always a vacuous position.

    Economics must be subservient to the needs of the society it exists within.

    • goodwipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Heck yes! Even the implementation of AI, and people getting let go. If enough people are unemployed, who’s actually buying the products that these companies are selling, peddled by the same AI that replaced the employees with? Feels like a free for all with these tech, not necessarily watching out for the overall impact on human societies…

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Why didn’t they get the procedure done anyway? So what, they owe $50K.

    Does his hospital insist on payment up front? Last time that I went, I was billed, though it was for much less money.

    How “new” was the treatment? Has it proven effective prior? He had gone metastatic already.

    the family briefly considered tapping their retirement savings to cover the out-of-pocket cost.

    So… they let him die to keep from dipping into their retirement savings? Am I reading this right?

    I am not generally a pro-insurance company person… but 50K? Even if I had NO retirement savings, personally I’d prefer bankruptcy over death

    • ASLWriteFan@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      We have had doctors and hospitals deny or refuse medical treatments because of insurance reimbursement. It does in fact happen. A lot more than people think. My guess is he felt the savings would be completely depleted because the cost would be more than they had and then his family would be left with nothing.

    • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I work in EMS. My advice to students and brand new EMTs is always the same: don’t freak out when your patient is in cardiac arrest. Those are the easy calls. I have to keep people alive and if someone is crashing in front of me I have to figure out why and what I can try to do to stop it so they don’t die. The ones that are already in cardiac arrest aren’t getting any more dead, and the only outcomes are that we improve on that or we don’t. We can’t make them worse. Dead is the most stable condition.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yeah, but then your patients often get a 3000 dollar “ambulance” bill bcz ambulance companies are still privately run.

          • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Forgive the long comment, and this is very US centered and doesn’t apply to every area in the US. EMS systems vary broadly between states and even municipalities within states…

            To put some of that in perspective:

            • A new ambulance costs about $250-$400k depending on the type.
            • The heart monitors we use are somewhere in the area of $10k-$25k a piece. That’s ONE piece of the equipment that we use, and they need maintenance and replacement every so often.
            • There’s all the other equipment, and restock of medical items. Even if something doesn’t get used it has to be on the truck and has to be replaced when it’s outdated.
            • Fuel is expensive. The last agency I worked for spent about $400k - $500k a year just on fuel.
            • There’s insurance - auto insurance, liability insurance, workman’s comp, etc.
            • Keeping an EMS certification active requires ongoing continuing education credits. We take classes constantly to stay current and to be able to renew our cert, which in some states costs money just to renew. I’ve spent hundreds just to be able to work, both in con ed classes and certs. Some agencies will help pay for this cost, and many provide free con ed classes for their providers. This costs money.
            • There’s building costs, rent, electric, etc.
            • Ongoing vehicle maintenance (ambulances break a LOT)
            • administrative costs, and so many more I haven’t listed

            And that’s all before you get into paying anyone for their work. You aren’t paying thousands of dollars for YOUR ambulance ride. You’re paying for the fact that the ambulance existed to respond to your emergency in the first place. Many agencies don’t get taxpayer money, and if they do, it’s minimal. My last agency had townships paying them $2k a year to provide 24-7 ambulance service with paid providers. That doesn’t even cover fuel, let alone anything else.

            Is it absolutely bullshit that people should have to be bankrupted to pay for an ambulance bill? 100% No one should have to worry about money when they’re having an emergency.

            If you don’t like it, advocate for a municipal tax. If every household paid something like $75-$100 a year you could have the best EMS service with well trained, well paid providers using the best, most up to date equipment available and you would never have to worry about an ambulance bill. The places that implement those taxes generally either don’t bill at all or bill insurance and only take what insurance pays them, there’s no balance billing of the patient.

            But no one wants extra taxes, even if it could save them thousands of dollars, and for some reason people come out and support funding for the fire departments and the police departments and no one wants to advocate for support and funding for EMS, so instead you get this mess where EMS is somehow expected to hold itself together and be a profitable enough business to self sustain. You end up with a system where providers are underpaid, have to work 70+ hour weeks to survive (and thus are incredibly burnt out and exhausted - you really want a provider who has worked 70 hours in 5 days on 10 hours of total sleep making life or death decisions?), the good providers head to places where they can get better pay, the equipment and ambulances are old and being held together by sheer will of the providers, and patients still have insane bills.

            Patients should not fund EMS. Government should fund EMS. It’s a service, not a business, but under the current system in most places, it has to be a business if you want to be able to call 911 and have someone there to respond.

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              You pretty much addressed my responses to the first half of your comment in the second half.

              That all sounds like reasons why the city/county/municipality/state should pay for EMS services.

              People are already paying taxes, so it’s not unreasonable for them to expect the governments that they’re funding to provide the critical services that everyone needs. It’s in everyone’s interest to have a smoothly-operating EMS service that doesn’t need to be run likely a business.

              Tax money already pays for police, and their budgets are already bloated as is. Why the hell can’t tax money be used to pay for all those costs of maintaining an EMS service? No one should be landed with a multi-thousand dollar bill for having a medical emergency.

              Healthcare in general should run this way, but especially emergency medical services. It’s absurd that it isn’t. But too many americans are afraid of the big scary “socialism,” so they continue to let billionaire oligarchs fuck them over like this. It’s insane.

    • 20cello@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      That’s the point, we’re not living a neutral situation, we’re under attack by bad people doing disgusting jobs

    • Soulphite@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It isn’t. It’s inhumane the way these companies are behaving. They’re a threat to society and this is humans’ instinctual response to eliminating threats.

      We are giving thousands of dollars of our money to a company to insure that our life and health will be taken care of, it should NOT be up to these companies what methods of remedies that a person needs to be kept alive and healthy are “deemed necessary”

      Furthermore; these companies CEO should NEVER be paid more than an average citizen… full stop. There’s no reason an insurance company employee owns a yacht.

      • gazby@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I’m so fascinated by the image of him having 8 downvotes while the comment calling for him by name only has 1 🤔

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Maybe people think he is depicting Jesus here? I mean the heart he is pointing at with his left hand is often seen in iconic portraits of Jesus (I am not sure if it also appears in portraits of saints, but that’s not entirely relevant if the point would be whether people THOUGHT that or not)?

          Oh who are we kidding, people probably just assume that the animation was generated by AI and so hate it for that reason:-P.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Remember when the Republicans were all screaming that Obamacare was going to create death panels? Should have thought twice before giving health insurance companies ideas…

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Long before the first Republican mentioned a “death panel,” private health insurance companies already had the same thing. And because Medicare was already a thing, the government also had the equivalent of death panels.

        No, the truth is that “death panel” is just a scary sounding phrase and never had any real relevance. I’ve noticed that conservatives don’t use words for their meanings. They use them for how scary they sound.

        • manxu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          That definitely tracks neuroscience’s finding that conservatives over-express fear in general. Probably one of the reasons why they cannot understand liberals.

  • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    This is flat out no different than shooting someone in my book.

    This is why people are behind Luigi.

  • wraekscadu@vargar.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    What’s the guy gonna do? Sue them? He’s dead. Murdered by the capitalist authoritarians.

    The only rightful place for kings is under the blade of a guillotine.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    And yet it is often by law that people have to have insurance that pays them nothing when the time comes.

    It is nothing short of robbery.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    They kill us through fraud And theft, and are surprised that we celebrated Luigi’s deeds. The truth is they will only start to care when more of them start to drop. How many more millions need to die because of this BS before we’re ready to bring justice down on their heads as a collective class?

      • 7101334@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        I think you mean complicit. “Complacent” doesn’t make very much sense in that context.

        It’s also a hollow edgy take, the likes of which would be expected from a shut-in teenager who doesn’t actually interact with people. Most Americans are exploited to the point of exhaustion, which is a little more complicated than just “they’re complicit”, and some Americans are putting in quite a lot of effort to improve the shithole country we’re from.

        Have you ever had a warehouse job, or anywhere else where you can actually speak with the exploited masses? If so, did you speak to them? Have you ever spend time in real-world organizing spaces? Not talking about just going to a protest, I mean getting involved with the people in your community who you’re accusing of being complicit. (PSL doesn’t count.)

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Nothing like the nypost comment section to get you out of your bubble. Can’t believe there’s so many insurance company defenders