Eyes Up’s purpose is to “preserve evidence until it can be used in court.” But it has been swept up in Apple’s attack on ICE-spotting apps.

      • athairmor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        ·
        22 days ago

        Well, both, really.

        Make sure they know you won’t be buying their process anymore because of these policies.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        If you are still using an apple phone in times like these then you are not taking your life serious enough. Big techs power will absolutely fuck things up in the coming series of purges in the US and people are totally unprepared for it.

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          How does one prepare for it without sitting around being a bored luddite all day? Idk how to tell you this, but the rot is total, and Americans simply aren’t willing to meet the moment

          • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            Can you not have fun without big tech platforms? There is so much stuff out there to do. So many hobbies both digital and physical to entertain yourself with.

            For tech things there is the open source nerds that continue to make it possible to remove the influence of our tech overlords from our lives while still making use of the hardware we already have.

            For climate change there are local groups in many cities (at least in Germany) with the specific idea of creating future proof communities that will survive supply chain collapse for food, water, electricity, etc.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yes, but also make it clear why you are leaving. And as dirty as it feels, don’t tell them their actions are irredeemable and they’ve lost you for life.

        If you tell them you’ll never come back no matter what, then they no longer have to care about your opinion. You’re essentially telling them that they should start catering more-heavily to the fascists now that the only potential customers don’t mind them bending the knee.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      They’re based in the USA, they have to work with the government or they’ll be targeted/taken over/shut down, surely?

      They could try to escape the USA and move all their operations to Europe, but I think they’re just going to stick where they are and do whatever the fascists want them to do. So long as they’re getting paid why should they care?

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        It would be better for the economy to commit suicide than to comply, and we as consumers have the power to make them if only we organized

  • PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    22 days ago

    People need to realize. There is no fair access to technology. You either bend the knee or have to create your own marketplace.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Its why I have linux PC / laptops, and GrapheneOS on my phone (may get a fairphone next time)

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        Me too, but the lords of Technofeudalism, backed by government, won’t allow that forever. Maybe on PCs, but not phones. No “side loading” what they don’t approve. Banks and co, only allowing their apps on approved OSs. No satnav traffic data unless you use an approved satnav, rendering them useless.

        The problem isn’t technological, it’s political. We need decent government protecting citizens and enforcing competition laws. The problem is the population don’t understand what is being done to them, so don’t vote against it.

        None of it is new. Liberty vs security, monopoly, etc, aren’t new, but wrapping it in technology blinds most people to it.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Agreed on decent government…that is tech savvy. At least Fairphone is independent and you can swap the default android to Ubuntu touch OS

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Same problems though. If you run something odd ball like Ubuntu, the banking apps won’t work and you may struggle to have a satnav with traffic info. If you run stock Android, you will soon only be able to install, sorry, “side load”, apps Google approves.

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    21 days ago

    I’m glad the google play store never censors apps, oh wait. It’s almost as if big corporations and now governments have no citizens best interests in mind, mind blowing.

    “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” - Benito Mussolini

    Dissolution of the Order of the Star

  • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    21 days ago

    “Which side did you choose when authoritarianism came to your doorstep?”

    Looks like Tim Apple has chosen.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    21 days ago

    Why can’t this be a web app that uses web notifications? Why does it even need to be an on-device app? That’s building in a vulnerability that doesn’t need to be there.

    Make it a site. Go to the site. Pin the site. Allow notifications from site. Done.

    Yes, Apple and Google are in the wrong, but why are we relying on them for this at all? Not everything needs to be a fucking app.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why are these apps being distributed on app stores

    Why are these apps not PWAs with an app store deployment wrapper???

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Better though than Framework who donate to bad open source developers. Hail big corporate! /s

      (This isn’t directed at you, I’m more frustrated by the people in the Framework controvery threads who somehow thing buying Apple or Dell is a more ethical choice).

  • courval@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    21 days ago

    We really need a Linux phone… It’s like the future of democracy depends on it…

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 days ago

      Future of democracy in the US relies on the people being vaguely intelligent as a group. Right now tens of millions of people there are straight-up worshipping an obvious fascist as god-king and a sizeable portion of the other chunk is still desperately clinging to the idea of being “moderate”.

      A linux phone would be nice but it’s not going to save the world if the people are still dumb and cowardly.

  • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Why do you need an app for that, when it can be blocked from both app stores? Did people forget about self hosted websites?

    • extremeboredom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 days ago

      I can’t think of a reason why, with client side scanning, they couldn’t in the near future implement a filter similar to this. Pictures and videos deemed “problematic” could magically disappear. And of course, your iPhone will send a helpful report to the local Gestapo branch. Eventually, “Sorry, network permission is required to run the camera app. You may not capture images of law enforcement activities per executive law. The camera will now be disabled until you comply.”

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      They actually did try the years ago. The idea was a signal could be sent to deactivate cameras and microphones on all phones in a vicinity. It was being pitched as a way to stop people from recording a live events like concerts but there was enormous outcry over the potential for abuse so it was dropped.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    22 days ago

    No shit, Big Tech is going to kowtow to whoever is in charge.

    Remove Apple’s restrictions from the equation and just make it a PWA. This isn’t the sort of app that needs to run natively on your device, anyway.

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I was wondering about that with some of the recent removals as well: Why not just a PWA?

      Something like Voyager or Phanpy runs excellent when installed as a PWA and especially with Phanpy I‘m not even missing a native app or „wrapper app“.

  • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I get it. Pomme bad. But why does this even need to be an “app”? Is it just a wrapper for a website?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 days ago

      Because people are stupid. We had a new client whose employees were asking for an app to access their payroll. I told the manager we didn’t have one but our website was optimized for mobile. Also told her I can show them how to put a shortcut on their home screen.

      “They’re just not going to be able to handle that. If they can’t download from the app store they’re helpless.”

      “But they’ll have an icon to click, just like an app.”

      She just shook her head. I ended up wrapping the site in an app and putting it in the Play Store.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      Here’s the app’s page on Google Play.

      Features: • Anonymous Recording – No account, no personal details required. • Secure Uploads – Encrypted transfer to privacy-focused storage. • Map-Based Sharing – Videos appear where they happened, for public awareness. • Offline Support – Record even without internet; upload when connected. • Metadata Control – Strips identifying data before publishing.

      Seems like more than just a website wrapper.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Surely all of those things can be done in a browser. You can grant location and camera permissions to a website easy enough. And encrypted transfer can be done any number of ways. Offline recording is possible with localstorage. All of this seems very achievable and effectively uncensorable by Apple.

        The only thing it can’t get is App Store search rank.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          Sure, it’s possible. But you’re basically turning the browser into a virtual machine and building an app on that virtual machine, jumping through a lot of weird hoops in the process. It’s unnecessary. Or should be unnecessary, anyway, with a sane operating system.