

I don’t even use AI, just looking at other peoples slop is exhausting.


I don’t even use AI, just looking at other peoples slop is exhausting.


AI very much did break Copyright law by taking stuff without having a license for it.
I haven’t read the article, but if the headline already starts out this wrong I don’t think it’ll get better.


You’ve already gotten a lot of responses about the first claim.
But to answer the second one:
Why would they mess with a specific app if they already control the OS? They could read everything they ever wanted from memory without anyone noticing.


No it’s not a good idea.
It’s extremely inefficent compared to just using elecricity directly for whatever you’re planning to do with it.


to ensure that its users are […] who they claim to be
I dont’t want that either. Maybe for verified accounts this makes sense, but not for the average shitposter.


Hot take: We shouldn’t lock down devices by default to a point where they protect even the most vulnerable.
Child safety locks exist for a reason and can also be used for the elderly.


All other countries curently forgo their climate commitments to “win” the AI race. (Whatever that even means)


Being shown in maps like this is opt-in, so there’s an unknown amount of users which are not displayed.


When the 3DS came out I was sure it would be a stepping stone to 3D TVs that didn’t require glasses.
3D TVs basically died out by now.


Maybe you want to edit your original comment. It looks like you’re claiming it does.


Does google photos really index photos locally? I somehow don’t believe that.


Hot take: even if they would get released uncensored and in full, nothing would happen.
We would just have confirmation on what we aready know.
At this point talking about the files is a distraction from the atrocities the US government commits and not the other way around.


I’m concerned he thinks he’s able to take Greenland as easy as he was able to kidnap Maduro.


“Some might consider this to be blackmail.”
Someone who doesn’t know what that word means maybe.


I hope people don’t buy the story that the kill switch was part of the plan all along.
This is clearly the result of mozilla scrambling for a compromise after the backlash to their recent announcement.
Edit: In the blog post that sparked the discussion there’s this sentence:
AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.
They didn’t mention a browser-wide kill switch but I agree that that could be what they meant.


This is the definition of ethically sourced data from the Apertus website:
[…] the training corpus builds only on data which is publicly available.
So they still train on Websites, Blogs and Social Media. Ethical my ass.
I guess the positive side of this is that at least some open source projects might move away from discord now.
The negative is that a lot of them used discord not only for communication but also documentation, losing all of that knowledge in the process.