I evolved from a monkey.

  • 2 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 27th, 2025

help-circle


















  • Other countries have done it. The size argument is bullshit, China is able to do it and has equivalent landmass. No excuses. The entire point of trains was to traverse these vast expanses. Trains are what drove the Westward expansion of American society. So arguing that trains can’t handle those distances is absurd.

    China has good rail service, but China still uses cars / transport trucks to get to many rural places. Source: I’ve been to rural China. I’m not against trains I just don’t think we can make it the primary means of transportation between rural towns


  • People used horse and buggy to transport goods between towns.

    This is what I’m talking about. How do we do this without cars? I was discussing this with someone else in this thread so I’ll just quote what I said there:

    To put things in perspective, Denmark is 42,947km2, and Canada is 9,984,670 km2. That means that you could fit almost 232 and a half Denmarks in Canada. Despite this about half of the population of Canada in the Quebec City-Windsor corridor, which is only 1,150 km-long, and about 90% of Canadians live within 100 miles of the US border. That means that the vast majority of Canada is totally rural, and there are often vast distances between towns and First Nations. It is simply not economically feasible to build rail lines to connect all these places, let along sending out regular train services to these places.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for car free infrastructure within towns, but I just don’t see how we can transport goods between rural towns without cars. Willing to have my mind changed tho