We don’t even have standards that strong in programming languages or even fucking machine code (ISAs) anymore.

I think I would like to return to that ideal time (if it ever existed), but… I feel like I’m in a vanishingly small minority.

I think it comes down to incentive structure, and the most clear incentives push away from strong stnadards. The big advantage to (a) strong standard(s) is(are) interoperability, but that’s something end users have to demand because it’s an anathema to rent-seeking-behavior (a central facet of surveillance capitalism, choke-point capitalism, enshittification, and technofuedalism). But, even there, natural incentives fail us, since most users get more utility from “innovative” features instead of low switching costs – or at least the think they do until they actually try to exit a platform/service.

I know very little about them, I was just quoting the expert from the article.

“As weird as it sounds, I honestly have to say I am not totally surprised by this. Remoras are just that weird.”

Plus, at the end, the only thing that Valve required was a statement that the two named entities are, in fact, both DBAs for one particular person, signed by that person.

Funny headlines, but 100% normal IP CYA behavior.

Well, if it’s good enough for quartz mining…

Good, the children yearn for the lithium mines. /s

Maybe I should re-train from computer programmer to lithium miner?

Then that word will just get used sarcastically.

Putting aside the problems in the current system, let’s not call Thiel’s system a justice system until we can see some results and verify they are just, 'k?

That’s basically the start of the Shadowrun dystopia. There were a lot of other things that “went wrong”, but when the government removed the liability from private security that has been protecting a hazardous materials transport from workers attacking it in the belief that it contained foodstuffs, it legitimized the “megacorp”: a corporation sufficiently powerful to impose their own legal system on their private real estate.

no pivot

Upvoted because the headline is funny, but it’s not true or at least hyperbolic. The third paragraph in the article gives it away:

The device, which resembles the lid of one of Prego’s pasta jars, seems to be more of a one-off doodad than an indicator that Prego is making a serious foray into being a tech company.

TIL, thanks!

If gravity could ever overcome expansion, then there would be some period where expansion was happening, but the rate of expansion was decreasing, eventually followed by expansion stopping, then contraction happening and the rate of contraction increasing. There would not be any period in which the rate of expansion was increasing.

(When you throw a ball up, after you release it, there’s a period of time when the ball is moving up, but it’s speed is decreasing, then it reaches the apex, and it start falling down and it’s speed increases until you catch it. There is no period where it upward speed increases.)

Current observations show not just that expansion continues, but that the rate of expansion is increasing.

(Not only has the big bang thrown the ball, but the ball’s upward speed is increasing.)

The TL;DR is that training AI on copyrighted works falls under the Fair Use exemptions in copyright law

This judgement was reversed by the next federal judge that reviewed AI, in the Meta case.

It is far from legally settled whether training is fair use or not.

If expansion were caused by “explosive forces from the big Bang”, it’s rate would be decreasing, not increasing.

Since current observations are inconsistent with that, we have to have a different (or at least additional) cause for expansion.

As the universe expands, distances grow, but mass does not. This causes the overall force of gravity to decrease. This means gravity is “losing” and will never catch up. (Gravity is weakening and expansion is growing). But, if it the rate of expansion were decreasing, that would mean gravity was “winning”, and might continue “winning” until it could reverse expansion.

I think current measurements show expansion itself increasing, which means gravity is already too weak to decrease expansion and will continue getting weaker. There’s definitely open questions, but most current observations and models do not point toward the universe ever collapsing back to a single point.

I thought that was just the Cybertruck, which yes, I wouldn’t drive even if someone gave me one. I’d flip it and buy something else.

I think both the sedan and roadster are okay electric cars, and I think they have enough range I could use them to reduce the amount of gas I burn in my Volt for longer trips.

But, I haven’t really been paying attention to Tesla recently, and Elmu has certainly been looking horrible to me.

Once companies started suing people trying to practice “responsible disclosure”, I stopped attacking people that choose maximum disclosure.

Responsible disclosure has always been a bit of a hedge. It’s rare to be able to show you are actually the first person/organization to discover a vulnerability.

we are going to need to develop a different model of learning, using, and processing information that considers the provenance of where the information came from and how it got there

They used to teach this in schools under “critical thinking skills”. Following the chain of sources to the primary sources was a task I had to to (at least in part) more than once in secondary school.

Authoritarians don’t like that tho.

Yeah, there was some phonics in my primary school education, and I continue to approach new words in that way sometimes. But, they said Phonetically.