derAbsender

As the study defines critical thinking: yes it does.

The study claims, essentially, relying on a machine that solves a Problem for you, lessens your critical thinking skills.

Their Definition of “critical thinking” is just, at least to me, way Off.

Just because i can conprehend Stuff i read for example, does not show critical thinking. It just shows i can repeat shit i read adequately.

It’s just bad science.

Wow. Now do this with a calculator.

Idc.

Do it.

Could they please cooperate with Framework and create Universal Joints?

Not only they call us Nazis but our laws call us nazis.

Solidarity with palastine is often Times already equated with Support for Hamas, which then in turn is interpreted as Support for antisemitic Terror Organisation and the you are held legally responsible for being antisemitic.

I bet there are already precedents when Israel was criticised and that was legally regarded as antisemitism, i am unaware of.

Almost like the profit incentive is bullshit …

Stupid question:

Are there really no safe guards to the merging process except for human oversight?

Isnt there some “In Review State” where people who want to see the experimental stuff, can pull this experimental stuff and if enough™ people say “This new shit is okay” it gets merged?

So the Main Project doesnt get poisoned and everyone can still contribute in a way and those who want to Experiment can test the New Stuff.