• Acemod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hate when they se terms like “cannot be explained” in the headline, and then proceed to explain it in the article.

    How lazy are journalists and editors these days?

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      If something in a headline is in quotes, it should be a direct quote. In this case, they are following that standard. It’s a direct quote of Dr. Kaiping Yu who worked on the research.

      It also happens to make for a very catchy headline.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’m right there with you when that kind of clickbaiting crops up, but this article actually isn’t doing that; they’re actually quoting the researchers:

      [Manganese]-based passivation is a counter-intuitive discovery, which cannot be explained by current knowledge in corrosion science.

      This seems like a genuinely novel discovery.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s all clickbait, people see a headline like that and read the article because it sounds like someone is making magic metal.