• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      nah, Sheila Jackson Lee, Democrat, member of the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the House, asked if the Mars rover took a pic of the flag planted by Neil Armstrong.

      Fucking idiots are bipartisan. Heart warming.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hell yeah, brother. People have elevated the presumed sanctity of their beliefs, no matter how stupid, to be the most sacred of liberties. Even over life and health.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Who decides who is an idiot? Those laws don’t work when you have the worst people in the country in charge, and the wrong people appointed by them up and down the line.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We, uh, could just fund secular public education.

      And yeah, I’m kinda pissed I have to add “secular” to that.

      • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I used to be all for religion as a way to give people’s lives meaning, then I realized that religion is just science denial.

        God is dead, he died when humans started measuring shit, it’s time to stop parading around his corpse.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t disagree, really.

          But just a friendly reminder that secular and atheist are two different things.

          Secularism is just a separation of religious affairs and government/state/public affairs.

          All I’m saying by adding secular to public schools is that Christian charter schools shouldn’t be funded with public funds; and that creationism/intelligent design/other things of that sort should be key out of the classroom. (And abstinence-only shouldn’t be taught in sex ed for fucks sake.)

          • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Indeed, we need to go with what the evidence says works.

            These “Voucher Programs” for Christian Schools is a huge problem. I have a cousin who flunked out of public school and is now in a Christian Private School. His overly religious father and Church have completely ruined the boy’s perception of reality.

            A big reason why he flunked public school is he’d refuse any assignment that acknowledged the big bang, existence of dinosaurs, existence of evolution, or the idea that the Earth is older than 6000 years.

            So Science was a big no.

            I’m geniunely worried the kid is going to end up trying to pray his way through life and fail to understand why it’s not working.

            And for fuck’s sake, I’m with you on “Absitnence-Only” being a failure. Hell I remember my Sex-Ed, it wasn’t Absistence only, they told us about condoms and stuff… It’s just they kept using so many awkward euphemisms and beating around the bush, that when it was done I thought sex was when a guy peed in a girl’s butt.

            Thank God porn exists, so I was able to figure out the real story.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              And for fuck’s sake, I’m with you on “Absitnence-Only” being a failure. Hell I remember my Sex-Ed, it wasn’t Absistence only, they told us about condoms and stuff… It’s just they kept using so many awkward euphemisms and beating around the bush, that when it was done I thought sex was when a guy peed in a girl’s butt.

              I find it deeply disturbing that the states with the highest level of teen pregnancies and STDs happens in the same states that do abstinence-only education. Additionally, education and free and easy access to condoms is the single best way to reduce abortions.

              A big reason why he flunked public school is he’d refuse any assignment that acknowledged the big bang, existence of dinosaurs, existence of evolution, or the idea that the Earth is older than 6000 years.

              Like… you could have a lot of fun with that. Chickens are dinosaurs (avians are technically extant theropoda dinosaurs.)

              • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                The problem with faith and believers in general. Be they believers in psychics, ghosts, aliens, Jesus, Xenu, etc.

                Is that they have already decided what they want to be true and no evidence can convince them otherwise. Anyone who deals in the evidence must be either close-minded or naive at best or outright lying at worst.

                Which is why scientists are either “Stuck believing the religion of Darwin and Scientism” or “On the payroll of big academia, silencing the truth about PSI and Nephilim!”

                It doesn’t matter that the evidence says comprehensive sex education prevents abortions and STDs. The “truth” is that safe sex is evil and cannot be taught without encouraging children to have it, because the truth was invented by “liberal pedophiles” who want to turn your children trans.

                This is why skeptics beat the believers everytime. Skeptics follow the evidence and believers do not.

                It’s why MAGA will never turn on Trump, what Trump says is the “truth”, evidence was created by the Deep State.

                It doesn’t matter that Trump is in the epstein files because Trump says he isn’t.

                It doesn’t matter that Evolution is one of the most successful theories in biology, the pastor says it’s a “theory in crisis”

                A common lie from believers is the idea that the institutions are “slowly turning to” whatever their idea is.

                As a former New Age I used to hear that Academia was slowly giving up on Materialism… that a few stubborn higher ups were just too attached to their pet hypotheses. I didn’t realize it was a scam till I realized creationists were told that “Real Scientists” find Evolution a little sus.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It sounds like they’re mixing “chemtrails” and “cloud seeding”. And they don’t understand either…

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How dare you read the article!

      That is by far one of the stupidest public consultations I’ve read about.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What the fuck!

      I just read the article, and I think it’s completely misrepresenting the bill! From what I can see, the article is just inventing this link to the chemtrails conspiracy.

      Does this bill ever mention the word “chemicals”, at all?

      From what I can tell, the bill is completely talking about cloud seeding, which is definitely its own thing. Cloud seeding is fraught enough, it’s a relatively complicated issue with very serious environmental impacts, it does not need to be mixed up chemtrails which are a bullshit conspiracy theory (the opposite of a serious issue).

      Hey Alabama Political Reporter go find your journalistic integrity, I think you dropped it somewhere.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Eh. They’re also blaming flooding on cloud seeding based on bad anecdotes.

      The camp mystic flood, that was a massive storm that dumped shitoads of rain in an area known to prone to flash flooding, all because a conservative commentator in ala-fucking-bama happened to be near camp mystic in Texas to see them seeding clouds… just before the flood started

      Probably, I suspect, because they don’t want to admit that GOP policies in Texas are fucking people over. Like the lack of being connected to either national power grid, or in the case of camp mystic, a dore lacking of storm/flood management infrastructure. (Including warning systems.)

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, I get get it. The crazy weather that were experiencing is not global warming, it’s chemtrails. And caused by the government. 🙃

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The chemtrails aren’t a thing, but in the legislators small mind, who would be behind them? Are they actually thinking that there’s some private individual that is spending billions building a secret massive network of bribed pilots and bribed mechanics that are spraying such chemicals to change the weather or influence the people in some ways?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Are they actually thinking that there’s some private individual that is spending billions building a secret massive network of bribed pilots and bribed mechanics that are spraying such chemicals to change the weather or influence the people in some ways?

      I mean, that’s basically what the petrochemical industry has done.

      Not to influence people chemically, but to keep business up.

  • zephiriz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Come on guys you all know.“Atheist are using unicorn’s to spread chemtrails to kill off all the Angeles in heaven.”

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It bans cloud seeding and geoengineering. Passing this off as a ‘ban on chemtrails’ is deliberately dishonest.

    a Class B misdemeanor for the injection, release or dispersal of “a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within or above this state for the purpose of affecting the weather, including temperature, climate, and intensity of sunlight.

    • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No it isn’t.

      They claim the recent floods were because of chemtrails from planes seeding in the sky (those trails of water vapour you see behind planes, ), based on aluminium found on the ground (cloud seeding is done with silver iodide btw and is incredibly expensive).

      Stop trying to downplay it.

      • Zangoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Presumably companies would be able to argue they aren’t pushing out pollutants with the intention to change the climate

        • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Unfortunately “the purpose of a system is what it does” doesn’t count as a valid argument when the ones in charge of the system have more money than the courts :/

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What?!? So how would the government control the sheeple then eh? What’s next, the moon projection will be turned off? Lizard people life matters!

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are many, many layers of stupid stacked here, but at the same time, this bill is quite sweeping and potentially dangerous. You might be opposed to the idea of manipulating atmospheric composition to fight climate change and it’s certainly not something we might want to just go ahead and do, but it is a possibility that’s worth exploring and ultimately might become a necessity. This bill kills any attempt to even experiment with this kind of technology, at least in the affected legislature.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Geo engineering is absolutely not something we want to look into. As if we could forsee the consequences, as if any one country has the right to decide to affect the entire world’s weather, and as if we could trust the companies that are doing this.

      They have a meeting every year in Switzerland, where they huddle up and go over their plans, coordinate on selling to governments, pr, all that. Epstein pal and childfucker Bill Gates is one of them. He is as convinced in the righteousness of pumping masses of sulphur dioxide in the upper atmosphere as he is of making roundup ready proprietary strains of crops to be able to use higher amounts of herbicides that systematically poison us, and every form of life, in entire watersheds. He invested in Monsanto, with his foundation at that, such a charitable contribution to society!

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t wait to see the house subcommittee hearing where a bunch of old republicans, playing lip-service for their uneducated base, interrogate a Boeing exec about what’s coming out of the back of their planes, and the Boeing exec’s display board catches fire and explodes on the house floor.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      10 Years After SCOTUS Gutted Voting Rights Act, Alabama Turnout Gap Is Worse

      Apart from 2018, the white-Black turnout gap increased each year from 2012 through 2022. During last year’s election, the white-Black gap was 9 points — triple the size of the gap only a decade ago. Put differently, some 90,000 more Black voters would have participated in Alabama last year if Black turnout had reached parity with white turnout. The white-nonwhite turnout gap remained at 13 percentage points, the same as in 2020 — translating to roughly 150,000 ballots uncast by people of color.