Yesterday while cooking I set off the smoke detector, no I did not burn anything. They go off when I cook over a high heat. And yesterday once they started going off they would not stop. I ended up having to disconnect them all (they are hard wired with an interconnect) and I replaced them this morning. Aaaaaaaand let me tell you, I had a sleepless night last night knowing there were no detectors installed.

https://www.southernliving.com/how-often-should-you-replace-smoke-detectors-8774122

  • lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ours were just replaced in our rental house. They were last replaced in 2004 and our corpo landlord just doesn’t give a fuck.

    I don’t think our dryer vent has been cleaned in a decade. This place is a fire trap.

      • lohky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve warned them about this and our gutters rotting away the wood on our patio and they told me both were tenant’s responsibility, despite a whole section on their website saying otherwise.

        I couldn’t give a fuck less about this house. I close on my first HOME next week!

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you live in a state that observes time changes you should get in the habit of checking them on that day. It means you check them twice a year and you’ll be mindful of the expiration date.

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you’re not living in USA-land you’re probably fine to simply change the battery every few years because you’ve got a photoelectric smoke detector.

    Ionization based smoke detectors (that require changing because radioactive…) are more unsafe and usually only allowed in special cases in non third world countries like the EU.

    Oh and you also can’t just throw them into the trash because you know radioactivity… except in USA-land…

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Photoelectric smoke detectors also need to be replaced every ten years or so, and the radioactivity of ionization alarms is well within safe levels as long as you aren’t taking them apart to eat the 241Am. They’re sensitive to different things but the photoelectric ones are probably better suited to modern home fires (but they’re more prone to false-positives from kitchen smoke).

      Pointless America Bad and radiation fear-mongering.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m genuinely curious: why do you need smoke detectors? I’m asking as an european that has lived without them all their life in more than one country. They are not mandatory here and not even common. What’s the reason to install ther? (I know the reason is to detect smoke, I’m asking the underlying reason behind the need to detect smoke)

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you are asleep and your house catches fire, the idea is that the smoke detector will wake you up with enough time hopefully to escape the fire. That is really their primary purpose.

      Some European countries do require them. Germany and Britain require smoke detectors in all residential buildings, for example.

    • The_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Possibly a difference in construction materials. Most stuff in the US is made of wood and other flammable materials. From what I understand, brick/stone based materials are the most common in European buildings.

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah, OP is just a troll. Most European countries by now have legislation to mandate them or are currently introducing these. All of them heavily advise them.

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wood as a construction material is not really the problem, it burn fairly slow. The problem is our furniture and other stuff changed from wood to MDF and petroleum based based products, reducing the time you have to react from 15 minutes to 3 minutes.

        If you look at a map of where smoke detectors are mandatory and where not in the EU, it’s more about rich vs poor: https://www.q-certified.eu/en/smoke-detector-legislation-in-the-european-union/

    • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I work in EMS. When we respond to house fires in the middle of the night there’s kind of two different ways they go. When people have smoke detectors and their house catches on fire in the middle of the night they’re the ones who call us and we get on scene to find them outside their home in their pajamas, watching their house burn, very shaken up but ok. They never need anything from us ambulance-wise except maybe some blankets. When people don’t have smoke detectors in their homes and they catch on fire in the middle of the night a neighbor or passer-by calls the fire in and we get on scene and the firefighters are dragging bodies out to us.

      • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        As I mentioned in another comment, I almost died in a house fire. I had an aerosol can in a pile of clothes that caught fire from a heater, that can exploded and woke me. Otherwise I would have slept through the fire.

        Your comment hits me really hard (I am sure not as hard as being on scene where they did not have detectors). But reading some of the dismissive comments I was starting to think I was over reacting, you assured me I was not.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        sends a company to check if they still work every year

        Wtf, isn’t it just pressing a button…? Though I guess you avoid the risk of people forgetting.

        It’s also required in Sweden, but the building owner is responsible for installation, whereas the people living there are responsible for testing that it still works.

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The main goal is probably to have documentation proving it was checked, but the technician is also responsible to fix any issues. I already had one smoke detector replaced because the noise level was a bit below what it should be.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are mandatory in Ireland, so please stop the “Europe” stuff.

      House fires were a huge cause of death and in apartment blocks they also can let one person’s mistake kill hundreds of others.

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are mandatory in Ireland, so please stop the “Europe” stuff.

        I haven’t said they are not mandatory in Europe. I have said that I am European and haven’t seen them in the countries I lived in.

        Tell me, are Spain and Italy countries that for some reason disqualify you from being European or did you just have a rough morning?

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No but it isn’t wise to generalise two of Europe’s less… regulated countries to just “Europe”. Pretty much every European country north of the Alps and west of the Vistula have mandatory smoke alarms/fire detection. It’s not a mystery why. 5000 Europeans a year die in residential fires and social housing, ie paid for by the tax payers, is disproportionately damaged by fire every year.

          You can say where you’re from. Nobody’s coming to find you.

          And yes, I’m probably more emotive about this issue than average. I’m sure that’s not a mystery why either.

    • MarieMarion@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Here in France rentals must have them, I believe. But I’ve never known anybody whose home caught fire. Maybe it has to do with building materials and regulations? In my région buildings are stone. My house had 90cm-thick granite walls. Radon is a bigger concern than fire.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also in Italy, it’s rare for houses to catch fire.

        But even if you live in a house made of concrete (Le Corbusier would be proud), things inside of the apartment can still catch fire.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If your smoke detectors go off when you are cooking, then the smoke detectors are too close to the kitchen. At least where I live, building code mandates one smoke detector in each bedroom, one in each hallway leading to a bedroom, and at least one smoke detector on each floor of the home. Generally, avoid placing smoke detectors near kitchens or exterior windows which, when open, are right next to a grill or other cooking appliance. Otherwise you’re going to be getting a lot of false positives.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The closest detector to the kitchen was in a bed room.

      There had been a different detector in the living room but had gotten knocked down a while ago and broke (and never replaced), it was not on the interlink system, and when the other detectors would go off while cooking the one in the living room would not.

      As you can see from my image, the detectors I replaced were from 2005, and needed replacing for quite some time.

  • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They make ones now with an internal battery that lasts 10 years. No more chirping and swapping 9V batteries.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m fact, smoke alarms with user-replaceable batteries became illegal in Scotland a couple of years ago.

      Still waiting to see if the same regulation gets applied across the entire UK, but anecdotally I’ve noticed it’s already much harder to find anything other than 10-year battery or hardwired models in my part of England.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It sucks ass. I’ve gone through about 5 of them well short of 10 years. I do see that this brand released a new version, but this is the one I had. Absolute garbage. They kept giving false positives, and they have no replaceable batteries so they just become E-waste after you disable them. This is the one I had.

      https://www.homedepot.com/pep/Kidde-10-Year-Worry-Free-Battery-Smoke-and-Carbon-Monoxide-Detector-Photoelectric-Sensor-3-Pack-21029899-3-21029899-3/203534175?

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          How many ~$25 items do you fill out a warranty claim for? Mine went into the bin and I got another.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not many, but I don’t buy a lot of $25 products in this day and age. Sometimes electronics fail early, that’s why there’s a warranty. I also don’t go complaining about something when it would have been replaced by warranty either.

            The fact they warrant the devices through their entire expected lifespan instead of only a year is notable.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s all they sell at Costco now and I’m worried they won’t last 10 years. They’re kinda pricey too $70 for two.

      • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve had the same problem with them. I don’t recommend them either.

        Even if they do have a warranty, they aren’t reliable enough to be worth doing the warranty claim on, imho.

        I’ve gone back to the old battery style and gotten some rechargeable 9 volt.

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    YSK that those old detectors will most likely not have the same plugs as the old ones, either. Prepare to figure out what circuit they’re all on and a rewire with new dongles (pigtails? Not sure of the right name). Ah, what a fun weekend. 15 min turned into a couple of hours.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      New ones had the same pigtail as the old one (both were Kiddie brand), but I did have one I had to rewire. As far as I can tell, they do not have a dedicated circuit, so I had to shut down the entire house.

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Mine were Kidde as well. They were installed by my dad maybe 17 years ago when he built the home. I eventually found the breaker after a fun game of yelling “Is the light on?” I laughed when I found out it was on the same breaker as the septic aerator (which I had apparently also attached to a garage circuit overhead for work lights and ceiling outlets for tools due to the wall circuit overloading). Fun fact for the people who may not be familiar with septic aerators - when they lose power they have a box on a separate circuit for the failure alarm (which isn’t very loud but annoying af).

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Depending on the building code / age of house it may or may not be on an individual circuit.

        I think newer homes don’t so there’s one less point of failure that can prevent them for going off in a fire. I could be wrong though.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    And please check them to see if they are safe to throw in the trash before you do. Some of them contain small amounts of really nasty stuff. Even the hazardous waste dropoff on my county was reluctant to take a batch from me. They said “you’re really supposed to send those back to the manufacturer.” But they did eventually take them.

    • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Decades ago i survived a house only because I had left an empty aerosol can of mousse in a pile of clothes. That pile started burning and caused the can to explode and wake me. Otherwise the fire would have consumed me as well.

        • nocturne@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It was a space heater, I had it on a timer (we had no heating in that part of the house) and I thought I had turned it off. My laundry pile was too close to the heater, it ignited the laundry which caused the can to rupture.

          The fire was isolated to my room, and my dad and I got it extinguished before the fire department arrived. We lived 20 miles outside town.

          I forget what the exact cause was listed as in the report, but it was not the same as the actual cause.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            that fire chief did you a solid by not including the ignition source in the official report.

            if they had, your insurer would have denied any claims had you made any, and your premiums would have increased since your risk assessments would have changed.

            glad to hear nobody was hurt and it wasn’t a total loss.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is why I just go ahead and buy the new ones that come with batteries that last 10 years. You’ll have to replace the whole unit when they die anyway.