• Sirdubdee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d rather take some sort of plastic magnet pill and poop out a G.I. Joe a couple days later. Rinse and repeat every 10 years.

  • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    People will do EVERYTHING but dealing with the root of the problem.

    • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry, what? Even if you get rid of all plastic tomorrow and stop leaking of microplastics into every part of your life, you will still carry those particles with you. Basically forever.

      So yeah, of course we need to address the root of the problem, but also we need therapies like this, cleaning out what is already in the body.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      But dealing with the root of the problem doesnt magically make the problem go away. We still need to deal with all the plastic that still exists after we fix the root. We still need a way to get microplastics out of the body. This is valuable research and you are essentially virtue signalling.

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is there any actual proven point of filtering out microplastics from the body? We still don’t know if there are any serious health effects from them, there is just this they might be connected to X,Y,Z. Even then the focus really should be environmental purification and water treatment.

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      We still don’t know if there are any serious health effects from them

      That’s no longer entirely true. They can cause inflamation and cancer for example and that’s been proven well beyond “potentially”.

      Even then the focus really should be environmental purification and water treatment.

      I think both is important. Getting rid of all the microplastics in the environment isn’t possible with current tech and if it ever is it’ll still be an extremely slow process. Plus there are people who are exposed to large doses of microplastics due to their work or the location of their home and for those it could be especially beneficial to get that stuff filtered out.

        • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I can give you the next best thing. This video explains various aspects that need to be considered with microplastics. It’s mostly an interview with Spanish scientist Joaquim Rovira sharing his findings with what’s usually a cooking channel. He has also published several papers on the topic. Him and his peers are a good place to start if you want the latest findings.

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, we should look after the root issue, too. At the moment this just seems like a vibe treatment for millionaires

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      The effects that worry me most and are arguably the best studied are those on the human endocrine system. It unarguably interferes with our hormonal system, although it is not yet known to which degree or how it impacts each individual separately. Most likely this will go the way of cigarettes; with the world “knowing” it’s poison but not taking action until the effects can absolutely no longer be ignored. By which time it will be too late for many.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh good. I’m glad we can just let 3M give microplastics to children in Indonesia once we all decide to quit our pack a day habit. Plus it’ll be nice to not be asked by the hostess if we want to sit in the microplastics or non-microplastics section of the restaurant anymore.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        No, it’ll go the way of carbon emissions i.e. the world “knowing” the problem but not taking action except for useless emissions targets that we blow past constantly.

  • ACbHrhMJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sure you could filter them out of the blood but don’t they get embedded in regular cells too?

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 days ago

      Regular cells die or split regularly. When they die, white blood cells eat them, and they’ll be part of filtering the blood.

      Neurons don’t though. There’s still some concerns.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Neurons die and replicate on a longer time frame, something like 7+ years, so I guess it’s just the long game with those ones

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          A lot of our neurons are with us for our whole life. Early neuron degeneration is what causes Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons, and similar disorders.

          Not all neurons last a lifetime, and there are kinds that die off and are replaced, but a good chunk of them aren’t meant to replicate anymore and so won’t be freed of microplastics by bloodletting, and would cause serious problems if microplastics harm their normal processes.