• gmtom@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I just want them to make a true flagship phone. I personally wouldn’t mind paying extra for a more ethical phone, if it had all the bells and whistles and wasn’t half obsolete straight out of the box.

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What features would that include that the phone doesn’t already have? I’m currently an iPhone user, but I’m looking to move to a more open source alternative.

  • FG_3479@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I love the idea but the price is too high for the chip given that this is designed to be a lengevity phone. A chip like the 7s Gen 3 would make the phone sluggish after a couple of years with how unoptimised todays apps are.

    The Gorilla Glass 7i and IP55 water resistance are also concerning given that budget Samsung, Xiaomi, etc phones beat this.

    However having components of the phone being easily replacable is a great thing.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I would totally buy one of these if they were sold in the US. Sadly, last time I checked the newest phone wasn’t sold here. So I doubt this one will be.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If they are all about swappable parts, and being able to upgrade your phone how you want … Shouldn’t this just be a module upgrade… Of the main part? Maybe I don’t understand it … At the very least the old parts should work with the new system right? Unless something major has changed.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Why does The Fairphone (Gen. 6) not have an audio jack?

    After some of the criticism that we received about removing the headphone jack from Fairphone 4, we did consider bringing it back for The Fairphone (Gen. 6). However, we realized it would be at the expense of increasing the phone’s dimensions. We also looked into the consumer data and Fairphone 4’s weight and thickness were more of an issue than the lack of a minijack, so we decided to keep the same approach, although it was a difficult decision. We didn’t want to invest in OLED technology for the display and then not have improved the phone’s dimensions and weight. But just like with Fairphone 4 and Fairphone 5, we will still offer an adapter, which has had overall positive user reviews.

    “We heard the criticism but decided that no, you would still need an adapter to use headphones, plus a USB-C hub to be able to charge the damn thing while listening to music or watching videos”

    Funny how that’s the same excuses that we get for modern laptops terrible design. “We HAVE to make it thinner so there’s no space! You wouldn’t want a laptop that’s not complete shit if it meant it’d also be less thin and breakable, now would you?”

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Let me expand, as I usually deal with surveys and population feedback. There’s loud feedback, and there’s statistically significant feedback.

      People who want a headphone jack are very loud. They will interject this issue into every feedback opportunity given. They will mention it on the comment sections, forums, q&a sessions, answer their surveys accordingly, etc. That’s all fine and their prerogative.

      However, when you look at the statistics. They are unfortunately a very tiny minority of the entire population. They are not statistically significant for decision making. They don’t have the volume to move sales significantly. This sucks, of course, and I personally wouldn’t mind the return of headphone jacks, smaller phones and bigger batteries as a fair trade for thicker phones.

      But unfortunately, the vast majority of the market is pre-occupied with other things. The phone screen is too small, the phone weights too much, the phone is too thick, I want to bring my phone to the pool without fear of it breaking, etc. They are not as passionate about it, not like the headphone people are, but they far outnumber them in several orders of magnitude. In the end, if the product doesn’t sell, it won’t matter how much it was worth to a single passionate person. It will sink the company if it doesn’t have mass appeal. Making phones is already an extremely expensive endeavor.

      • FG_3479@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You can get good Bluetooth earbuds for under $50 and a USB-C to AUX dongle for under $15.

        The average person is fine with Bluetooth earbuds or an adapter, and audiophiles would not find the inbuilt DAC/amp on a phone to be adequate.

          • 46_and_2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Wirelessly.

            Or you switch to your bluetooth buds during a wired charge.

            I’m all for audio jacks, but have been using a phone without one for 4 years now, and there are so many options to not be incovenienced.

            Also I don’t use my audiophile headphones with the phone at all - DAC on it just isn’t good enough to get most out of then, prefer to use them with my desktop PC amp only.

      • xvapx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        People who want a headphone jack […] are unfortunately a very tiny minority of the entire population.

        People interested in paying more for fair trade materials and repairable phones are also a very tiny minority of the entire population.
        Of course I don’t have any statistic, but I would guess that the proportion of people wanting a Jack is significantly higher in the group of people interested in buying Fairphone that on the general population.

        In my particular case, I’m still using my Fairphone 3, and I’m not buying a Fairphone again unless it has a Jack.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Have a look at their impact report. They themselves claim that they don’t spend more than €5 per phone on fair trade or environmental stuff.

          You are only paying more for that phone because they are a tiny boutique manufacturer who has to outsource everything. The fair/eco stuff is just fair- and greenwashing.

          If you buy a phone because you want to look fair/eco, buy a Fairphone. If you actually really care for fair/eco, get an used phone and donate some money to the correct NGOs or charities.

      • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What statistics? People buying thin phones over thicker phones doesn’t mean much when that’s almost all that’s being sold nowadays and every phone is trying to be as thin as possible. It seemed to me that 90% of what we’re told people want is actually just what companies want to push on us because it’s cheaper and more profitable.

        All the people I know who are average users couldn’t care less about how thin the phone is, two mm more or less doesn’t make any difference. They care about screen size and being able to use it without too much hassle. If they get a phone without an audio jack half of them will just assume that they can’t plug earphones at all. And they are not the ones who will complain. But then, Fairphone isn’t marketed towards average users, so maybe their users have different priorities? Idk

    • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Very strange how mine can somehow fit a 7000mAh battery, dual SIM + SD card slot and a regular jack. Hmm…

      • sexy_peach@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Is it repairable only with a screwdriver and parts you can buy from the manufacturer?

        • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          That’s a definite advantage of the Fairphone.

          I guess, I will find out how mine fares when the need arises. Hasn’t happened in 4.5 years yet.

          • seejur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Are you a Republican? Because that really sounds like “mine works, so fuck everyone else”

    • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Okay, I’m going to ask… why don’t you use wireless?

      Edit: some results are in, and the only reasonable answer is better audio quality, although that’s probably no longer true. The rest are fairly weak reasons.

      Lol’d at the 10m extension cord though, thanks for that one.

      • Kannushi_Link@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Latency issue, in some use cases it’s not acceptable to have 0.1~0.3 sec lag, like racing games or rhythm games.

        (Yeah, I know there are some wireless protocols to make latency shorter, but it might cost a lot to buy a supported headphone, and it’s still useless if the phone doesn’t have proper protocol supports.)

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Battery degradation. Wired earphones/headphones can be BIFL if treated properly. A typical wireless device will see battery degradation within a handful of years, and I have yet to see a decent TWS solution with replaceable batteries.

      • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago
        • They are expensive. You can get wired earphones for 2 euros that actually work and are reasonably durable. It’s not a great loss if they fall in a puddle or if I step on them.
        • They are a lot more failure prone. Half of those I tried didn’t work or only half worked, and those that did work didn’t last very long.
        • They have shitty range. I can use a 10 meters extension cord with wired earphones if I want to.
        • They require charging. And it’s a law of physics that everything that requires charging always run out at the most inconvenient time.
        • Also THEY ALWAYS GET LOST. Wireless earphones, mouse, controllers… it doesn’t matter, if it’s not attached with a cable they’ll just disappear.
  • Panties@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    No earphone jack again. That’s a bit sad. Even though I mainly use BLT earbuds, I still sometimes wish I could use my wired headphones. It’s just a small inconvenience

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Not having a headphone jack is just a slap in the face from a company whose whole image is supposed to be longevity and eco-friendly.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced…

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I disagree about this being a good solution. USB-C is not meant to take the strain of being used as an audio port when being used in the go so there is risk of damaging the port while a headphone jack is more stable and allows the plug to rotate. Plus I don’t want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          They should make cases with the adapter built in, the way they used to (still do?) for external battery packs.

      • Panties@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s really a small inconvenience, but using an adapter would mean I’d be prone to misplace it when I use my headphones on anything else, so it hardly makes anything better

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The reason for not using a headphone jack is making it simpler for the manufacturer, one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

          I’m not saying this is good for the consumer, but there are reasons for integrating the functionality into the USB-C port.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

            The headphone jack is 3.5mm. iPhones are ~7.5mm thick, more than double. The smallest phone available on the market is 4.2mm.

          • hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            These points were all disproved long ago. The jack is a the same thickness as the display.

            The reason is because BT headphones have a much higher margin, and need to be replaced every few years because of the battery (if not already replaced because they were lost or damaged).

            It’s just a dumb cash grab.

          • shaggyb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            For $700 I’m not interested in compromising my own convenience for theirs.

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Fair, though the fact doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

              If you want easily replaceable parts and a system that can unlock the bootloader for example, your argument can be made for 99% of phones on the market. The more requirements you add, the smaller the scope gets until there are no devices left to choose from.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s not hard to manufacture a headphone jack. We’ve been doing it since the 80s. Probably costs them a penny BOM.

        • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          fast charging / USB-PD may not work, and 3.5mm media controls may not pass through properly

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      “Modularity” but still no headphone jack, couldn’t I just have a backplate with a big bump on it to accommodate a 3.5mm jack?

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Big? The headphone jack is not large enough to protrude from a cell phone chassis. Any company telling you they can’t fit it is just lying to sell you BT headphones.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I’m assuming they are removing the headphone jack cause the internal components take up too much space. I can’t imagine these companies removing the jacks cause they cost too much money.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I was just hoping a phone like fairphone would give me the option to buy a small module or something to let me do it.

      Yes, yes there’s adapters … yes, yes, you don’t need to use it … I understand. I just want it.

    • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I never use wired headphones even though I have a jack in my phone. But I have never bought a phone without a jack and probably never will.

      Ipersonally think it’s user hostile to remove the jack and also goes directly agains the green profile Fairphone wants to have.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Probably not a popular thing to say on here, but I think you’ve lost the battle for the earphone jack. It probably just requires way too much real estate to be practical on a modern day cell phone.

  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    18 hours ago

    There’s a deGoogled version too!!

    I would prefer GrapheneOS (If I can live with the irony of getting a Pixel phone just to deGoogle it…). Sandboxing there is way better. But you lose the Repairability… Gotta check and compare the new EU metrics too.

    They are just two different devices.

      • kepix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        the degoogled roms like eos calyx lineage graphene are not just aosp zero work roms with no gapps inclueded. the devs do work on changing as much google related code as they can even within aosp. nothing is perfect obviously, but im pretty sure there are compatible mobile linux distros even.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Interesting that they seem to be using a consumer grade Snapdragon chip this time, typically they used weird chips ment for industry applications if I’m not mistaken. Wonder what sparked the change, did Qualcomm start supporting their chips for longer?

  • srasmus@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Did some digging, but it doesn’t appear the band compatibility with US carriers is improved at all. Am I wrong here?

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Doesn’t this thing just run android and Google App Store? What a waste of decent hardware.

  • blunderworld@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    It’s too bad they dont ship to Canada. I’m in the market for a new phone and would seriously consider this.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The state of mobile phone market in Canada is so frustrating. Not only is our market dominated by 3 players who refuse to actually compete with each other, but we miss out on half the cool phones that the rest of the world gets too.

  • Whale_Visual@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    main camera, AI-powered low-light magic

    Can I turn it off? Can I? I just want my photos, the real ones, however bad they are. I don’t want them to be half generated.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Just to be clear, unless you’re shooting RAW you never have your “real” photos. Every phone/camera performs massive amounts of post processing, including using ml models.

      AI is only a buzzword for something that has been the norm for a while.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Is there any chance this is the same HDR technology that has been around for at least 10 years, but using latest marketing buzzwords?

      • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Also, working a bit on developing my photos from RAW over last years taught me how we actually expect a lot of magic from a regular camera. The brain does a lot of work and low/high light compensation, color balance, etc… are required to some extend. Of course sometimes it becomes a bit absurd : most smartphone pictures seems oversaturated, with clear blue skies and I one took a photo of a blue-ish mountain because (I think) some classifier thought it was part of the sky.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They have adapters. But yeah, would be nice to have a slot directly integrated.