Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    264
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Just to fast-forward this dumb cat-and-mouse thing, the next step is people go back to torrenting their porn and deeper down the rabbit hole of garbage “free” websites skirting the rules.

    As always, the UK is useful on the international stage because sometimes you need to be able to point at some idiot trying dumb stuff to explain to people why dumb stuff is dumb.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      11 days ago

      It does feel that way. UK bureaucracy is just one giant guinea pig stunting it’s own commonwealth.

      Next someone will try enforcing paper umbrellas as a solution for climate action. We’ll all say, “That won’t work”. They’ll still do it; it won’t work. We’ll say, “We told you so”, and it won’t get reversed because they’re already aiming at the next foot to shoot.

      • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 days ago

        There has to be a logical next step for the information age. Old school government is not fucking working, and we can all see it.

        The fact that there aren’t large scale riots already is astounding.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I am pretty sure they would consider tor as using a VPN.

        Probably they would demand ISPs to run lists of known VPN addresses and if you connect to them, they will forward the information to the anti-terrorism unit and you will get SWATed.

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Their next strategy will be to keep a list of websites that are “government approved”, I’m afraid. Long live the Great UK Firewall!!

  • KonnaPerkele@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    This kinda proves that it was never about the children. How many children have know how and the means to buy a VPN subscription?

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      All it takes is one big brother/sister that knows how to access a free or paid VPN and their 5 year old little sibling and all their friends will have it also. Despite the difficulty teaching them math or history, they DO learn very quickly and are fast to figure out new things that interest them.

      Do you know what’s smarter and more talented the the UK government?

      14, 402, 544 kids…

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Were you never a child? I formatted my family pc and reinstalled windows xp in 5th grade, and used a proxy to circumvent the schools online filter in 7th grade.

      Children are not as stupid as you seem to think

      VPNs also accept many anonymous payment methods that happen to be easily accessible to children, like gift cards. And free VPNs exist

      • KonnaPerkele@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Where there is a will there is a way, I guess.

        Still, a possible ban on VPNs affects way bigger group of business and adult users than the number of tech savvy kids.

        Where should the line be drawn? How much rights should everyone have to give up so that little techie Billy can’t hack his way to see some titties?

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    11 days ago

    the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems

    The government: Parents have you tried being a parent to your children?

    Parents: Oh lord no that’s too difficult can’t you just, I don’t know lol, ban it or something?

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      In my English textbook, ca. 2007 there was a comic of a child in a cage hanging outside the house. The father told the neighbor something like “This way they get out of the house, but stay off the streets.”

      I think that hit quite well, what many consider parenting in the UK.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Those child cages were real. They would attach to a window similar to AC units today.

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      This government literally can’t afford to fuck about wasting money yet here they are. Proving they are imposters failing the country.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    11 days ago

    This ends with just another war on encryption.

    When encryption is legal, they can’t know what is going on between two points. They going to make is so we can only have encryption to nodes they trust?

    It is dangerously technologically illiterate to wage war on encryption.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      Jokes on you, e2e encryption is already banned in some cases in the uk afaik. Hence apple dropping some cloud services

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Easy enough to do when it’s mega corps. They don’t really care about anything but money. If everyone had self hosted services with e2e, be far harder. Encryption is everywhere now.

        So they will go after the end points. Which again, is a battle they can’t win. All very Cory Doctorow’s “Unauthorized Bread”.

        If you care about this stuff:

        UK: https://action.openrightsgroup.org/make-one-donation US: https://www.eff.org/pages/donate-eff EU: https://my.fsfe.org/donate

        There will be others too, those are just in my head’s cache.

        Some how we need to get governments to listen to us serfs instead mega corps and authoritarian police/spooks.

        The world they want is not only terrible for digital and political freedom, but competition, thus functioning markets. It’s terrible for making developers and makers instead of dumb consumers, which in turn, is terrible for technology and progress.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    If they outlaw VPNs then all internet-connected businesses will flee and everyone will just move to the dark net. Then you’ve got a whole other problem.

    These ancient tyrants are in over their heads.

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Selfishly, I think this is great for I2P/Snowflake/Tor. The incoming legitimate traffic helps to protect its most vulnerable users.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The UK has long championed writing legislative checks that their emaciated state infrastructure can’t cash.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Honest question but what makes you think that would happen? Do most businesses use VPNs?

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 days ago

        VPNs are one of the core security measures of all large companies.

        VPNs aren’t just a “hide your IP” tool, they’re a way of giving someone access to an organisation’s internal network. Sensitive servers such as databases, wikis, scheduling tools etc don’t have publicly exposed IPs, they only have connections that are accessible from inside that VPN. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_in_depth_(computing)

        • Blemgo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          Not only that, but they are crucial for network security. VPNs allow all network traffic (with a few necessary exceptions) to be routed through the company’s network and benefit from its security measures, mainly monitoring traffic for suspicious and malicious behaviour. Without it, finding compromised PCs is much harder and enforcing company policies regarding web use would be impossible outside the office.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 days ago

        Damn near every business uses VPN technology. They literally cannot exist in the modern world without it. It would be incredibly expensive and impractical to do without.

    • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      If they do outlaw it will likely be banned solely for non-business use for this reason alone.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    11 days ago

    That sounds a bit like fear mongering from Reform: a VPN is safety 101 when using public networks, and most businesses make use of VPNs to secure their data. They are also a key component if WFH (you use the company VPN).

    If Labour are stupid enough to go after VPN usage, I suspect it would guarantee their loss at the next election.

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 days ago

      Eh, I dunno. The vast majority have no idea what a VPN is. If a VPN ban benefits Rupert fucking Murdoch then the tabloids will wang on about how they’re used by paedophiles and people smugglers and that’ll be that.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It has always been the main aim of legislation like this to nobble VPNs, they just needed the “child” “violent pornography” etc. excuse to do so. UK government already monitors all of the internet traffic for the UK, except for MPs who are exempt, VPNs are a blocker for this.

      Obviously, not even the UK government would expect a private VPN ban (work VPNs would likely need an Ofcom license) to stop everybody from using a VPN or suitable alternative, its not the aim. The aim is to stop the majority from doing so and criminalize the minority who do still bypass the block as it gives them the power to seize equipment, ask for your logins (its illegal punishable with jail time to not supply this in the UK), request ISP logs etc. to deep dive into your life.

        • tankplanker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah that’s the point of the license from Ofcom, to approve the endpoint address used for the VPN. Most work places don’t use some random IP address but a small pool of known DNS entries for their endpoint. Just because you are using a VPN doesn’t mean nobody can see which endpoint you using.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    It would have been smarter for the UK to mandate that every ISP must provide a family filter for free as part of their service. Something that is optional and can be turned on or off by the account holder but allows parents to set filters (and curfews) if they want. They could even require that ISPs require new signups to affirm if they want it on or off by default so people with families are more likely to start with it enabled.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      The problem is that they’re not trying to protect kids. They’re trying to be like China where every user has to identify themselves so they can be tracked across the internet.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Crazy because every (isp provided) router I have used has these options. They probably aren’t 100% correct all the time, but it would be good enough for children (even though you shouldn’t rely soley on filters to replace watching your kid).

    • archiduc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Exactly. This was turned on on my professional phone so that was always an option.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Damn. Labor really wants to lose that election to Farage. Good luck to Corbyn and Sultana, I guess.

  • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    11 days ago

    “It has come to our attention that we haven’t fascismed hard enough, nor in sufficient detail”

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    “Safety” meanwhile these same mp’s can’t budget can’t run critical public services like bloody hospitals.

    But don’t worry, your thoughts and activity are policed.

    Democratic failure to prioritise and run a country at its finest on display for the world to see. The waste is astounding.

  • JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 days ago

    If this comes to anything I’m moving to somewhere in the EU and pursuing citizenship there. This is clearly not about protecting the children anymore (not that it ever was).

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 days ago

      EU is about to do the exact same thing. Norway is the place to be. That’s where I went - at least according to my ip address.

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            I saw this news and I guess it’s good that privacy is being discussed somewhat soberly over there in the wake of this investment decision.

            Personally I have recently been exiting out of the UK, a much more invasive country, so Switzerland for now does seem like an improvement for me. Norway is further out geographically and has less Mullvad servers, would seem like the less favorable option for me unless the proposed laws actually pass.

            Frankly I’m scrambling after the UK’s ID thing.

        • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          No other than it’s geographically closer to my actual location so I thought the speed would be faster.