There is ALWAYS too much crapvgoing on. and the news changes focus every time anything even begins to feel remotely stale.
Meaning, it’s not just Republicans who are part of the problem. Sensationalist news plays right into their hands.
Same with overly religous people. “God works in mysterious ways”. No, Karen, disease is a terrible thing and your kid got the Measles, got encephalitis, and now has brain damage. Good job.
That would seriously be the funniest shit ever if he just old-man lost balance and fell to his death while waving to his sycophantic moron crouds…
Ahhhhh yea, great points… I totally forgot about that despite the glorious https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KaqC5FnvAEc
Yea, definitely a story beat that works far better in book form. Or I guess later movies/shows as suggested, too. lol
Holy shit, that sounds like an epic story to leave out of the trilogy movies! lol Though of course I understand why they wanted a nice clean happy ending to that tale. Not like Peter et. al. knew it’d blow up so huge and they’d end up able to do far more eventually.
As someone who’s not familiar with the breadth of stories told outside of visual media… what’s so great about that part of the story? I do thoroughly enjoy the universe, I’m just not much of a fiction reader any more!
Intensely? Not sure what you mean but I’d figure women would benefit from shorter. Less of a little tube to squeeze through should be less resistance.
Though if you’re Hank Hill with a narrow urethra, I don’t think you’re peeing ‘intensely’ any time soon!
There are plenty of accounts of children surviving in the wilderness for shockingly long periods of time. Sure, they’re not well fed and without disease in most cases, but that happens in the wild a lot more than most people care to contemplate.
Eh, need is a strong word past maybe 6-7. Humans aren’t as dumb as many adults would make you think.
… Not to say they’d be well off, nor would such a life be easy by any means, but like… if an animal can survive in the wild, we usually say they’re fine, even if they’ll live 1/3rd as long in the wild as in captivity on average.
Because they’re not limitations. They’re jail cell bars. It’s the classic, “the system is broken” vs, “working as intended”.
He’s right: The rich do have a massive imbalance of influence, and they like to keep it that way. It’s limited on purpose.
I don’t get it. Where’s the knee?