It’s not though. There are some situations where you shouldn’t ‘give’, and others where you shouldn’t ‘take’. This is one of the former cases he is correct.
Edit: didn’t the original say Zelensky not Putin? This whole thread seems a bit off if it wasn’t modified
I think it’s probably just framed that way because Russia never officially took responsibility for it, not because anyone believes Ukraine really did it
Is this you, Ken M?
It’s been Labour policy for over a decade that Palestine should be recognised, but that was in conflict with a governmental position that only states that ‘exist’ in some stable sense could be recognised. The balance tipped, I guess, and now the former outweighs the latter. Don’t think it’s quite as suss as made out.
I think it’s one of those things which technically enables some stuff (embassies or some shit? The reframing of Israel as literally invading another country, rather than committing sins against ppl whose homeland exists but doesn’t exist?) but probably won’t have much on an impact and is more designed to say ‘hehm. Ackshually it is not totally super cool what you guys are doing’. But then we probably continue to sell them components and widgets that ultimately get used in war machines because dude have you seen the way predominantly-English-speaking nations act towards those that aren’t? But like I think it as at least something, and will likely have implications of technical legality that make some enablement of Israel more difficult or even impossible as the new setting takes hold. Maybe.
Of course by that time…
But let’s hold onto some tiny modicum of hope, because what else is there. Even a teaspoon of water in the desert is better than mouth of sand.
moderating more than five subreddits with 100,000 monthly visitors.
I mean, that’s clearly a rule that considers size of sub a factor, so, um, what?
I liked the winning entry! And was incredibly relieved…
What we lose on sales we make up for in volume
Fake: Tucker Carlson Gay: Buttigieg
4chan post confirmed
I’m not even sure which elements of this are bait, sarcasm, or douche
FFS I was just about to buy myself one and now I’m obviously gonna have to wait until November
Oh, wait, I can just upgrade it. Nbd.
Where I live, they haven’t all been. I suspect many feel about guns and pot the same way as you feel about drugs that haven’t been legalised in your area.
Anyway, legalisation of drugs isn’t the hard bit, it’s the regulation that can be tricky to get right…
Sometimes people just take drugs because drugs are fun … Not all of them are despairing or desperate…
Ah. You know theory.
Definite ‘never progressed beyond their first year hot takes’ mentality in some spaces, but I’d argue an engaged older high-schooler will often end up in similar political boats
Reddit stopped being any good when that guy doing a batman/joker role reversal writing prompt stopped posting
I agree, and whilst I don’t personally bother with vpns myself because I prefer other solutions, it’s one of the things that helps prevent insane UK politicians’ bad hottakes on tech becoming law
Edit: an apostrophe
dunno, this seems a pretty chill instance and your experience mostly matches mine. There are a few knobheads I see around though (I started adding user notes and it’s amazing how any agro chat is always one of the same few accounts)
Let us gay.
deleted by creator