These “makeshift” structures are housing hardware that costs millions of dollars in total.

“Putting AI servers inside tents, officially called “rapid deployment structures,” is one of the more unique approaches to the AI build-out, Thomas said. They’re certainly not as sturdy as physical buildings made from steel and concrete, with one commenter comparing it to the “classic $10k racing bike with a $9 lock” situation.”

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    jet engines

    AI

    How to burn endless amounts of fuel in order to make more noise than sense 😁

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I also am a qualified expert on what does and doesn’t look like mad max, and I concur.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve seen Mad Max and I’m going to disagree. This looks LITERALLY EXACTLY LIKE MAD MAX to me and you can’t diminish that, because it’s entirely subjective. But also correct. The resemblance is uncanny.

    • notgold@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Was thinking this too. They probably won’t even relocate them as it’s more efficient to put in the newest gear in their new facility

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yeah, probably won’t even dismantle it, just bulldoze this 10 billion dollars into a pit and bury the lot. Then go spend another 10 billion on a shiny new tent+compute

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Please stop using AI, please.

    If you’re required to use AI for your job, then sabotage the efforts.

    I beg of you.

    • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Pure wishful thinking like this is just as useful as thoughts and prayers.

      This is a overhyped technology just like the internet was before the dotcom bubble popped.

      The best you can hope for is for the AI bubble to burst and then see what AI is like when it normalises.

      Because to think this technology will just go away is going to end the same way as for tge people who said the internet is just a temporary fad.

      • excral@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        When the dot com bubble bursted, the typical internet speed was 56k modem speed and cellular internet practically didn’t exist. At that point the internet still needed years of exponential technological advancement to allow for stuff like streaming amd mobile services. The difference with the AI bubble is that they try to brute force their way out of infancy by throwing ludicrous amounts of money, energy and other recources at it instead of waiting for the much needed technological progress

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          While everyone had 56k modems, they laid millions of miles of finer optic cable. That sounds like brute forcing to me. Most of it laid there dark for 20 years.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Then 9/11 happened and suddenly we have Wi-Fi and Bluetooth competed with infrared before it dominated. Bluetooth’s wlan not getting good is still sad to me.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I have been, by focusing on enabling team members to use it exactly like how leadership wants. You want them to use more AI? Okay… they need Agentic harnesses that can do work for them locally. They need MacBook Pros to run the models. They need cloud keys to test different frontier models for different loads. They need governance, observability, repeatability, scheduling, human-in-the-loop…

      I’m going to show them that anyone can build a bridge, but only an engineer can build a bridge that barely works. On top of that, I’m going to show them that they’re wrong in believing they want a bridge. All it should take is seeing that they got exactly what they wanted without getting anything that they wanted.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve been cruising with the most expensive model at work for a while now. After github’s pricing model change they finally asked us to be more conscious about which model we’re using, but eh, it’s easier to just leave it on Claude 4.8. I figure eventually the costs will catch up with the company.

    • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s not even necessary. It will come down on its own. Recent reportings in my company says we’ve increased our productivity by 10℅ while the number of defects rose by 40℅. And the cost increases with every month. It’s unsustainable.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Might be the same structure, but Meta confirms they’re doing exactly this:

      Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg first announced the strategy of pitching tents and filling them with AI servers last year. It seems that he wanted the infrastructure to come online quickly while demand for compute is increasing exponentially.

  • gnufuu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Let the homeless move in and use the hardware as they see fit. They deserve dignity and epic LAN parties

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Has there been an environmental study in these makeshift camps? If these were homeless, we’d placate drug use, bulldoze them to vacate the camps. What. The. Fuck.

    • fake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Not unusual in the slightest. They’re often used as peaking plants that fire up when energy prices are driven high enough by demand. Can be setup to run on all sorts of different fuels.

      • benny@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        This isn’t for power peaks, it’s for a temporary data center. There is nothing usual about it.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          If these are supposed to be used as backup generators then gas turbines are a good fit in technical sense. Can start quickly, don’t need a lot of space or cooling, can work on partial load; lead times are somehow short, and you can just pack it all in containers and set up anywhere which seems to be important. The catch is that efficiency is probably just below 40% instead of 60% and slightly above for regular CCGT plant, thst is you need to burn extra 50%-ish gas (methane is cheapest fuel and can just be piped). about anything that burns and can be pumped through a nozzle can be used

          Then there’s matter of smog. You’re supposed to put giant catalytic converter (sorta) on this thing and normal powerplants do just that. Apparently techbro oligarchs decided it’s not disruptive enough this way

          but dw this won’t last, talking about bubble broke to the mainstream now