These ads aren’t cheap, makes me wonder who purchased it.
You must log in or # to comment.
makes me wonder who purchased it.
Probably Elizabeth.
Marketing was her main skill, wasn’t it?
You mean lying? So… yeah?
If your product is at least decent, you dont have to lie to be good at marketing.
Hers obviously wasnt, of course, but this is the internet so I have to be pendantic.
“You don’t have to lie to work here, but it helps!”
No doubt at all. She had to have a reason to participate in the deeply unsettling-looking Nathan Fielder documentary, and I assume in her mind this is all part of the same master plan to rehabilitate her image.
I’m just hoping the nudity in her documentary is her.
Come on, she can’t be that bad. I’ll throw in two bits!
If it’s an offer, no thanks.
Why would they deceive you?
I mean, she’s hot and slightly younger than me… but I cannot get over those eyes…
Yes and the fraud, lying, general moral rot, yadda yadda… but those eyes man… creeps me the fuck out… it’s uncanney alley type shit.
From the back, then
What do you mean “hot”? If we’re being very gracious she looks like an average person during a mild-to-moderate allergic reaction to shellfish
I don’t know what kind of unrealistic expectations you have my dude. But (apart from the “I will murder you in your sleep”-eyes) she is an attractive 42 year old woman.
Very funny to come across this organically after you just got pissed at me about pointing out misogyny in a different thread. Now you’re here just making fun of a woman’s appearance to say another guy is wrong to find her hot, which is also fucked up and objectifying.
Bit of a pattern developing here, rare to see it that close together without looking for it.
Is it bad that I confuse her face with Jodi Arias?
Some images of her really make her look like some kind of Real Doll or something. It’s quite eerie.
I think she earned her time in prison and should serve it. But, if we’re letting other scam artists wander the streets (I’m lookin’ at you Sam! And Dario too! Weirdo cult-eugenicist-rationalist-effective-altruist shitheels!) I can see why she would attempt this.
It could also be a marketing thing for the film.
What firm?
There is a new documentary film coming out on Holmes.
Oh right. My bad. I read “the firm” dur.
This is definitely what this ad is for and I kind of resent seeing it now.
Fuck this clown and her whole circus.
An LED light advertisement on the side of a digivan is the definition of cheap.
Lol, why? She screwed up by messing around with rich people’s money. Tisk tisk.
Is that like “free candy”? Where can I get my “free Elizabeth Holmes”?
Viral marketing for “You Can See Everything” perhaps?
This makes the most sense to me. This screams marketing department.
“With the purchase of an Elizabeth Holmes of equal or greater value.”
What could an Elizabeth Holmes even cost? $10?
There’s always money in the Elizabeth Holmes stand
¡Soy loco por los Elizabeth Holmes!
Probably advertising for the movie.
Must be some Youtuber for a publicity stunt. Honestly, in a world that’s fighting for your attention, it’s not odd to see odd things.
