Take the normalized cruelty and punching down that most are brainwashed into, and give the apes ideas, sickness called freedom.
Is there a simple alternative without political, social or privacy red flags to recommend for my family group chat?
Signal, or RCS (also has end to end encryption now)
Let me see if I have my pedo-billionaire glasses tinted correctly:
School shootings are caused by violent video games, teenage depression, and propping doors open. But promoting Nazi-fascist ideology while posting videos that dehumanize others? All good!
Fascist ideology is specifically about dehumanizing others. Its premise is that some humans are persons while others are not.
Its actual premise is that no humans are persons but property is, specifically huge amounts of capital.
But they don’t say it that way, lest their alt-right warboys realize how expendable they are.
Wow. They don’t want to offend the manosphere that’s been making nazi jokes for ten years now. Ha ha, killing people in ovens, isn’t it funny? /s
Suckerberg is such a piece of shit.
It’s like Fox not wanting to offend their audience by telling them the truth.
Is he not Jewish? I don’t understand how he can so completely kotow to the white nationalists that I can no longer block from my Facebook feed.
Meta has hundreds of billions to chase superintelligence, but apparently can’t figure out how to remove AI videos depicting child abuse, even when journalists hand over the accounts. Facebook’s recommendation algorithm can find this content effortlessly. Shame the moderation team apparently can’t.
They also have the energy to ban queer users and deadname indigenous folks
Can’t or won’t? They’re pretty good and removing women’s health information and other things fascists want them to.
Well how else are you supposed to cook fresh baby back ribs, not like it’s beef and you can get it anywhere. Acquiring an infant is a lot like donating a kidney, they always ask questions like “where did you get that?” “Who’s is that?” And “Why does it have a bite taken out of it?” then when they stop asking stupid questions they start shouting shit like “Put your hands up!” Upside to the latter is that I get roast pork alongside the baby back ribs, still though youd expect them to be a bit more grateful.
Found Jonathan Swift’s Lemmy account.
Who?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal
A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick, commonly referred to simply as A Modest Proposal, is a 1729 satirical essay by the Anglo-Irish writer and clergyman Jonathan Swift. The essay, written from the perspective of a fictional narrator, suggests that the Irish poor could ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to wealthy gentlemen and ladies. In English writing, the phrase “a modest proposal” is now conventionally an allusion to this style of deadpan satire.
If fake babies roasting in ovens was a bad thing, how come The Sims never got cancelled? 🤔

I’ll bite. Modding a game is your business; it’s up to each internet board to decide if that mod or its depictions is acceptable within its terms of use.
Facebook’s terms of use probably prohibits depicting pictures of babies in ovens, thus, if it’s imposed on some and not others, that’s not the correct implementation of their own terms of use·
This isn’t a mod.
It’s a bug.
🤔 but why does the burned baby texture exist?
It’s not a whole texture; it’s just a hue change over whatever is on the grill. Normally the food items aren’t even 3D objects, they’re 2D sprites.
Tho apparently, someone did make a mod after the bug was fixed that allows you to grill babies on purpose instead of it just randomly happening if you attempted to grill while holding a baby.
SIGNIFICANTLY less realistic
Only someone who regularly roasts babies on the barbie would know this 😉
Where’s the video? Something tells me it’s not that realistic.
Also, this reminds me of the Bonsai Kitten panic at the turn of the century.
People called DOOM realistic when it came out in 1993.
Allegedly they used Doom to desensitize soldiers?
Marketing stunt. They made an official mod and stuck Marines™ on it. They were doing pathetic shit like that in the 90s to keep enlistments up. It was never meant to be a real “simulator.”
Not Doom, no, but the military did (and probably still does) have an FPS video game it used for training.
Yes, but having played like VS3 or something of AA, in the early 00s, AA is a lot more… structured and realistic in the sense of the job rather than the amount of gore it had.
If I was my current age back then I would have asked those people what drugs they were on to see demons IRL.
Couple shrimps on the barbie, eh?
I’ve already moved off it, Mastodon is a much nicer feel. In fact I try not to use anything Meta including WhatsApp.
I’m trying to cure my immediate peer group by introducing and promoting Signal over Whatsapp. It’s an uphill battle.
My family group decided to move when I spat the dummy after Meta decided to harvest all the contacts for WhatsApp users. Effectively they are the only ones I use messaging with but for getting others on is a long road.
don’t forget threads either. it was ripped entirely off of mastodon.
Always have laughed at Zuck’s claim that Threads had such a large user base just after the launch. By all accounts , anyone with a Meta account became a Threads user.
When I still used Facebook would regularly report imitation sites and posts pretending to be national news outlets as impersonation and misinformation. They would never do anything about it. On Instagram I’ve reported openly hateful accounts calling for violence against groups, as their account name or bio and it doesn’t violate their TOS according to the responses I’m getting.
Same. I would report stuff multiple times. Things obviously criminal in nature.
End of the day, Facebook is that desperate for engagement. They’ll allow anything to happen on the platform.
hint: is the baby roasting in oven video accompanied by a hasbara/description of “this is what hamas/palestinians do to Israeli babies”?
That would explain a lot.
I can’t say I care about these videos either while real children are still going hungry. Save your activism for children that exist please
There may be some merit to the argument that people who get off on this stuff can do so without harming an actual child. Of course, there’s the counter argument that this stuff can normalise this sort of abuse and make it more likely to occur to a real child. There’s also the fact that these AI gen tools are trained on existing data, they’re not making this shit up, they don’t have imagination. So I’m pretty sure that the training data will have included lots of material of actual children being harmed. Certainly there are real children in need, and yes they need help. But this sort of material being published should concern all of us. What happens when your activism on behalf of hungry children is met with people pointing to these torture videos and saying “Lol could be worse!”
is this the new “selective altruism”
I wanted to see one of these awful videos for myself, so I went to Google and started typing “Facebook baby in oven” when Google suggested to add “how long” 😂
When I ask how oven, you ask
Google, 30 minutes later: “Wait, you meant baby potatoes, right? RIGHT?”
Well you don’t want to undercook them. They’ve got all sorts of germs.
Yeah, and you want time for the stuffing to cook properly too.
I’m sure the Trump regime will charge a large tech company with crimes any day now. \s
Saving the
childrenprofits as usualDamn, so much for “protecting the children” ig
Think of the childred has never meant what they want you to think it means





















