“This is it. We’re dead. We’re going to die right here in the Waymo.”

This combined with another recent article from some insiders at Tesla saying, along the lines, “You couldn’t pay me to let one of these things drive me somewhere.”

And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “never having to drive again.”

EDIT: Comments have pointed out that this story is, at best, overblown and semi-fabricated otherwise. Take it with a massive grain of salt. But feel free to discuss self-driving, waymo, etc in the comments!

  • innermachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    As a car and motorcycle enthusiast I can’t imagine never wanting to drive again, but then most people driving aren’t their just steering wheel holders using the 30 minute commute to get in their daily reels. Self driving cars are honestly probably better than half those morons that can’t be bothered to looks where they fling their 2 ton steel cage, but if they nail me on my motorcycle they have to pay. If a self driving appliance on wheels slams into me a PR firm will make sure they don’t pay dime to me. Until the people that sign off on this tech are directly responsible for everything their tech does then they should not be in the road point blank. Doesn’t matter how good or bad self driving cars are, with no responsibility to their actions they have no place roaming around the public where they can cause injury and property damage to others.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Exactly. If the only cost to the company for any death or maiming these things cause is money, then it’s just “the cost of doing business”. They’ll only make the cars as safe as the law says they must, and they’ll pay to make those laws as weak as possible, and push the responsibility to anyone else they can.

  • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “never having to drive again.”

    Did they not heard about public transport or it doesn’t count because it isn’t choke-full of fancy tech and isn’t pushed by techbro?(it is choke-full of fancy tech but never pushed by techbro)

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Public transit in the US simply isn’t good enough in many cases. Years ago I lived in a suburb north of Boston and worked in another suburb west of Boston. It was about a 40 minute drive during rush hour. Trying to do that same commute by public transit likely would have taken me 4+ hours and involved a bus to a subway into Boston followed by a commuter train and another bus. It would have been a nightmare.

      • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Like the point is, if people are giving a “this thing isn’t good enough now but will be great in the future” for this lobotaxi thing, they sure can give the same treatment to public transport as well. Of course it isn’t great now, the government spend little to nothing on it to make it good. But what if people start pushing for more public transport development? It will be better in the future, everyone win.

        • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Yeah, but that would require raising taxes, which the billionaires have convinced the masses is a terrible thing because socialism, and look where that’s gotten third world socialist countries.

          The only solution, according to the billionaires, and the brainwashed masses, is to give even more money to the billionaires so that they can privatize things even more and throw cutting edge technology at the problem instead of proven solutions like light rail, etc.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    ”never having to drive again”

    Y’know I can’t put my finger on it but something tells me that there’s an alternative to that without technofascist wet-dream robocars involved 🤔

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I mean, keeping your passengers away from cops is a very good way to keep them alive in the USA.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Only if they’re not already focused on you. Once they are, trying to get away is likely to get you shot in the back when they fear for their lives because you’re running away or something.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Permit me to reiterate an idea I had the last time a self-driving car did something illegal:

    All of these cars are being driven by the same software “driver”. That driver is in contempt of the law. Thus it needs to be punished like any other driver in contempt of the law. All fines to be paid by its representative human or company. All incarceration to be for as long as is necessary for the driver to be rehabilitated. If no such rehabilitation is possible, the driver is permanently banned from driving.

    By which I mean, all Waymos need to be taken off the road until they’re provably rehabilitated and it is certain that this won’t happen again.

    And if Waymo the company thinks that would be detrimental to their business, tough. Take some responsibility and fix your damn cars.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Also when a human takes remote control, does that person have a driving licence valid in the place they are driving. Because last i heard they were in Indonesia or something. Presumably a taxi drivers licence as they are carrying passing passengers.

    • scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I’m sure Waymo’s lawyers would argue that a simple software update would make the “driver” an entirely new entity, and thus free from the fines and incarceration. You’re raising some interesting legal questions that we’d have to figure out

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        By that logic, I would not legally be the same person as I would be tomorrow since my brain would not have an identical cellular structure as it does today.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Your honor, my client’s largest organ has completely different cells compared to when they were arrested a few weeks ago, and so I move to dismiss the case.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      That would make too much sense. They are operating a vehicle, regardless of whether or not said vehicle has a “human driver” there is a person who is allowing said vehicle onto the road and is the person at the top of the chain of authority which sent those vehicles out.

      Like, if I sent out a swarm of killer drones no one would argue that it was me who killed people. Of course, in today’s world, you can have insurance companies supercede medical instruction, leading to the deaths of thousands, and that’s not even a news story.

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          They can vote now, as well–as long as they live in that one state where all the corporations reside. This shit is so stupid

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    The article links to another source, but the video they show doesn’t have the elements the passenger describes, like speeding through a construction zone or evading police. All you see in the video is the car moving less than 1 MPH while trying to merge through a clusterfuck of traffic. Is there a longer version of the video somewhere? Because so far, it sounds fishy. Especially with claims from Tesla workers, of all people, commenting on it.

    • other_cat@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Ah bummer. Though I should mention the Tesla workers comment was just me paraphrasing a different article talking about Tesla’s auto-driving, not Waymo related stuff. I saw the two today, but saved one and not the other.

      I’ve edited in a disclaimer to be skeptical. Thank you for catching that!

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Ah, I was confused what the insider quote was about and wrote a comment wry some of that ambiguity in mind. Thanks for clearing it up

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      There is a little bit of video in there of the car going quite fast, but the guy seems to mostly be filming the seat and the floor, so you only glimpse movement out of the window for a moment or two.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Humans crash cars all the time, and yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “not having to drive” because they’re going in their friend’s car.

  • baronvonj@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “never having to drive again.”

    Not having to drive again will be awesome. But Never would I think the first version of that to be the one that gets it right.

    • other_cat@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      You are absolutely correct. I hate driving. I take any opportunity to not do it that I can.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I’m all for self driving car tech, but not with goals of perpetual revenue generation.

    Give me something that is an addon to any car without any subscription or maintenance fees so I can just have it installed in my own car or in a few family cars, otherwise i’m truly not interested in providing yet another techbro for pay to use technology full of day 1 enshittification goals that include paying workers absolutely nothing.

    We all know that by the time real self driving cars are established they will cost as much or more than paying an actual human to do the job and all profit goes into the hands of a few. It’s just like what they’re going for with AI overall.

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    This combined with another recent article from some insiders at Tesla saying, along the lines, “You couldn’t pay me to let one of these things drive me somewhere.”

    Was said insider talking about Teslas or were they whinging about a competitor that makes better vehicles than they do?

    • other_cat@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Tesla

      Found the article! https://www.reuters.com/investigations/why-teslas-ai-trainers-dont-trust-its-self-driving-tech-or-its-safety-stats-2026-05-28/

      Seven of the former data labelers told Reuters they wouldn’t trust FSD to drive them. “We have all seen it fail,” one said. Another said he wouldn’t ride in a Tesla robotaxi “if you fucking paid me.” One veteran self-driving engineer, who reviewed Tesla crash data for years, called its safety claims “bullshit.”

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      It was probably about Teslas given the state of Tesla’s “self driving” feature.

      Still, given everything I’ve heard about how Waymos react to novel situations, I’m not too keen on trusting my life to them either.

      • TheGreatRapsBeat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yet. Trust your life to them… yet. All it takes is ALL vehicles to eventually be autonomous, and then you never have to worry about loss of life or injury. If all vehicles followed every rule to a “T,” there would be no issues.

        • i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          When you look at all the edge cases, road rules are not 100% consistent. They rely on human judgement to manage the (rare) ambiguous situations, such as a misaligned road intersection. With ever vehicules following every rules to a T, there would still be issues.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          I mean, if there are no humans on the road they won’t be dying there. Doesn’t seem like it would be very good for us, though, to no longer be allowed to travel.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        In my limited experience they all suck. I was driving a new Ford with “driver assist” and it decided to nearly kill everyone in the immediate area while driving through a construction zone. The transition from my driving to the vehicle taking over felt similar to the time my power steering (instant horror) went out and the transition from vehicle misreading the situation to my somewhat panicked regaining control felt like performing a highly illegal driving manuever. I’m singling out Ford because that was the vehicle make, but I’m fairly certain the technology itself is undercooked. I’ll be sticking with my ancient vehicle as long as possible and maybe go buy something with a tape deck or 8-track next.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      But they’re fine with being payed to do it to other people. Typical tech bro attitude.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    insiders at Tesla saying, along the lines, “You couldn’t pay me to let one of these things drive me somewhere.”

    That’s rich coming from cars that don’t use LIDAR and rely solely on cameras.