Some seashells laid out in 86 47.
jfc, it took me wayyyyy to long to figure it was just like… “kick out '47”.
I thought it was some crazy complicated code. No. Just 86.
For those of us out of the loop, why would 8647 mean “Kick out Trump?”
Nice message though, shame it never happened I suppose :-(
It took like… FAR more effort than it should have for me to get it.
86, slang, as in something you might tell your buddies like: “Oh I they 86’d from the bar last night because they were wasted”
86, as in, getting kicked out. See: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=86
Then, “47”, as in, the 47th president.
However, its only now I’m learning about its use to refer to a grave. I’ve never heard that before. I’ve only heard the usage as a verb/ adverb “to get 86’d”
Ah, I thought 47 as in agent 47 so it was suggesting shooting trump or something.
Yeah i got a bit wooshed.
86 is pretty old slang originating in the hospitality industry, meaning to throw something away. It then came to include kicking people out, and also left the hospitality industry to become general slang.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86_(term) and Trump is the 47th president
Trump doesn’t know how to use the three Sea shells
I was thinking the exact same thing
As usual, I’m late for the party.
So how did society evolve to replace toilet paper with three seashells - and they skip right over the bidet?
i posit the shells are the bidet controls. low pressure, high pressure, blow dry.
That actually makes sense.
This gets laughed out of court, right? Right?
If nothing else than for the fact that Trump and friends made public statements condemning him. Can’t really have an impartial jury after that
Absolutely, it’s obviously a desperation Hail Mary play, but not before Comey spends several thousand dollars on lawyers, after spending a whole lot to defend himself the last time.
Perhaps there is a family strategy at play. His daughter was fired as a Federal prosecutor, after working on high profile cases like Epstein. She is now sueing the DoJ, and will probably win, so maybe she can use some of that government money to cover her Dad’s legal bills.
He should also sue for malicious prosecution.
Yes, but it is intended as harassment, not “justice”.
He still needs a lawyer, he can’t just ignore it.
The president is committing war crimes and the FBI is charging the former FBI director over an insta post from a year ago, clearly suggesting impeachment.
seems like a direct violation of his first amendment rights.
unless he comes out and says what it means, it’s subjective art that is up to interpretation.
true but even if you say “i think x should die” you’re still within your rights. none of “thinking” is actionable.
So the DOJ is hoping that nobody on the jury knows that 86 means to give someone the bum’s rush, not to kill them.
Even then, if it were a threat, which it isn’t, it’s in no way actionable.
This will never reach the jury. There won’t even be a Day 2. The judge will toss this immediately.
This time, yes. But eventually, they’re going to get a MAGA judge, and someone will go to political prison. That will set a precedent.
From the headline, I was imagining that he had used broken seashells to physically threathen Trump.
And a judge ok’d this warrant?
There’s an old saying about grand juries that also applies to a great many judges: They would indict a ham sandwich if the DA asked them to.
Theyd indict a ham sandwich, but not a ham sandwich TOSSER!
American judges don’t need to have any actual knowledge of the law, they just have to get the job.
There are enough corrupt MAGA judges that, if they try long enough, a case will land with one.
Like Trump’s Insurrection case landing with Jack Smith, and the Stolen Documents case with Cannon.
Leopard says, he helped give us Donald Trump in 2016…
I’m no expert but wasn’t he just following the law? As i remember correctly some FBI field office fucked up and they found new evidence to be analysed that has been disapeared, draging the whole process. He had no other choice than to inform the public that the investigation against Hillary was reopened.
No.
I think it was a discretionary move, and an unusual one at that. Normally, the FBI does not comment on pending investigations of public officers at all. This is doubly the case near an election, to avoid the appearance of favoritism and impropriety.
In 2016, rumor was that the (allegedly highly pro-Trump) Manhattan office of the FBI was going to announce that the email investigation had been reopened. It would have been for political reasons, but that seemed to have been part of the calculus.
Comey then decided to come out and make the statement himself, making the Manhattan office’s parallel move redundant. At the time, it was thought that he (a) believed that Clinton would win, anyway, and (b) thought the move would give him credentials for future office when the Republicans were back in power.
❄️❄️❄️
Wow, distraction time again, since this happened more than a year ago.
- “I’m not a pedophile”
- “My beautiful ballroom”
- Convicted rapist
- Mentioned over a thousand times in the released Epstein files. I bet none of us are
You know who never has to say, “I’m not a pedophile?”
People who aren’t pedophiles.
They are gonna place him in front of a firing squad aren’t they?
Man I hope so, but I’m guessing they’ll have to wait until he’s out of office first for “reasons”.
First they came for…
Aww fuck it; they’re coming for anyone speaking ill of the orange fat fucking turd shitstain now.
And I stand by that assessment.
8647
Mango’s annual schedule of follow-ups must be based on his Facebook “on this day”
This guy doesn’t know about the shells!!!
