If they are to be separated so be it. In not taking that chance, all that blood is in this Pope’s hands.

Off course there’s never been a Pope who hasn’t been at least happily complacent in mass murder. In not condemning it he endorses it.

But to the Pope it is more important to maximize his power, be in from murderers, pedophiles, conmen or a devil of any kind. This God’s emissary on Earth has always been a refuge for the most evil people on it, and continues to be so.

Well how could it not be? Genetically it’s just two random people, what would be the basis of making it illegal if at some point your parents hit off?

Generally not believing in human rights comes as a package deal.

Well the specifics in other religions are a little different but all have a part about pushing your moral responsibility and development on something else. You are never at fault, or are always at fault so it doesn’t matter. And even if it doesn’t matter you apply scripture so facing legal punishment is unnecessary.

Religion is for people of no morals or intelligence to supplant both.

The point of religion is to place yourself above societal ethics with a excuse not to feel bad about failing to match them since your deity loves child molesters or however anyway.

Organizing a religion that emphasizes freedom and tries to incorporate all our likes or dislikes into it is one test of religious freedom I’ve always wanted to make.

After all if you can globally mutilate children and harass every single other group in existence for religious purposes surely we can be allowed total media freedom, subsidies for our cultural high quality food and preferred parking for our subsidized luxury cars for our starter sacred privileges in society?

Yeah, you buy food just to throw it away by this logic.

The fact that statements on international law are made by heads of state demonstrates that it is actually politics, not law.

Not a bit more insane than any religious person.

She told him to leave. No doesn’t mean no to you? Or are women so stupid and emotional you should not trust what they say?

“Germany” is the state that did nothing. Something happened in Germany, Germany had nothing to do with it.

It isn’t a quote, just a note that it is called Germany, not the Holy Roman Empire. Though every European country has strong theocratic legacies.

“The Branch of the Catholic Church in Germany.”

That is not Germany’s business nor should it be.

Meanwhile it is not actually an argument without merit that employers would prefer employees not to be absent with no recourse 10-15% of the month compared to others.

And that’s why there should be a “no foreigners or blacks”-option.

Well you know, the reason is that The ruling elite of Europe get to wet their beaks on all of that.

My man was barebacking production with Claude for 2.5 years with no backup, high chance the data was majorly hallucinated anyway.

Now now, those kids haven’t paid their protection money like the dealers and mobsters they “fail” to catch.

I didn’t ever claim free will existed. Just congratulated you on your success.

Now if you want a world free of strife, that’s more of a task even in a pre-determined universe.

Well, then use the words you mean. Cruelty was clearly an incorrect one. We can’t exchange ideas effectively of you refuse to use words with their assigned meaning.