• sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    We can get as angry as we want at billionaires, the sociopathic ghouls that they are, but I really feel that’s just a distraction to encourage us to look a symptom when we really need to focus on the disease.

    • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am curious what do you see as being disease? What’s going on in the US seems like a pretty typical oligarch takeover of political parties, judiciary and media (this is not even something unique to the US, can and does happen in many places).

      Solving the disease of course depends on the given local context, but more often than not you will have to prosecute oligarchs in addition to a broader package of anti-corruption and judicial reforms.

    • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No need to shoot him, we just need an independent court to put him on trial for enablement of the Rohingya genocide and knowingly gaining $14 B in commissions from fraud (while developing a “playbook” to claim that this was legal).

      Don’t even need to shoot him, it would be much better to give him 50 year community service as a junior janitor on the Rohingya refugee camp on the island of Bhasan Char should he be found responsible. If he is too good for that, than he can do 50 years in prison instead.

      This should also apply to any other senior executives involved in these two cases.

      And these are just two cases, there are definitely other, less well known, “regional” cases involving Meta goons and Zuckerberg.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your comment may seem extremist. People may find it distasteful or even straight up illegal.

      But then I wonder: wouldn’t a similar comment have been received the same way if it was made about Hitler in 1920, before he became what we know now? And yet, it would have been the sane thing to do…

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wouldn’t work for Facebook if they tripled my current salary.

    I take that back, I have enough leave saved up I could reasonably take a 4 month sabbatical so I would for about 4 months to make a years salary in that short amount of time and then tell Facebook to fuck off.

    • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You mean in 4 months you’d unilaterally change your ToS. They’re familiar with that practice, they’ll get it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t work for Facebook if they tripled my current salary.

      Okay, tap the breaks. Triple my salary and I’m retiring very comfortably before I hit 50. Would happily take the Zuck Bucks for that kind of cash, especially if I knew I’d be ushered into the Leisure Class ten years earlier.

      Also… who else are you working for that’s less toxic? Like, Fuck Zuck, but he’s hardly an outlayer in the world of narcissist CEOs.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In all seriousness he absolutely is worse than most. He operates on more impactful sale, a third of the world is his monthly userbase. His whims hurt people.

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ll just say they do exist. It’s not with out caveats mind you but its been pretty good for 25 years

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well yeah I get that. But I wouldn’t trust them for stable employment when they make decisions like this. Of all the FANG jobs about the only one I would trust is Apple honestly.

          • billwashere@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re totally right. High reward, high risk. The trick is to maximize the reward by keeping risk under a threshold. Unless you’re 25 with no responsibilities then it’s balls to the wall, I’ll sleep when I’m dead.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Which is really the problem. They are using the Harley Davidson business model. Make something hard to aquire and people will perceive it as more valuable. They have a tough interview process, it demands skills that aren’t needed for the job. The job itself is just like any other large corp job. Lots of overhead, lots of bureaucracy. They do this because it keeps their pipeline of candidates full. But also because people who get hired will often feel like they were given a chance to prove themsleves or something. But in reality, very few people will know the difference between someone who was highly successful there and someone who was not.

        And most of them have a lots of custom software that was developed in house. I interviewed a guy from AWS not long ago. Nice guy, clearly trapped in a shitty work environment. Been there long enough to be senior. Trouble is he had no experience or even exposure to the tools we needed. All he had was AWS experience. If he was less than senior, that would be fine, but for a senior roll, he needed to have somthing else. They do that to make it garder for people to leave.

        In my mind, fang is a waste of talented people. With the skills needed to pass the interview, most could do a lot more somewhere smaller.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hope they saved up their undeserved bonuses for slapping their name on other people’s work :)

  • patruelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even if Meta replaced its entire workforce with AI, payroll savings would only be roughly $27 billion, a fraction of the $145 billion infrastructure spend.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey now, that infrastructure is good for, like, 3 years, so it’s really like spending $145 billion to save $81 billion. And that doesn’t even start to get into how much it costs to operate that infrastructure.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    the ANDROID zuckerborg sees humans as expendables. he is a pretty calculated CEO though, he and parker ensured that he has majority country over FB’/META so he cant be ousted by a BOARD.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah another thought to have though is that 8,000 Meta employees suddenly on the market makes life harder for other people who’ve been laid off and are still looking for work, some of them for a whole year without success.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thats the only audience i maybe have empathy for but im sure things are quite different at that level of jobs and compensation

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why stop there? Fuck all employees of the owning class. How dare they be employed

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re willing to defend Meta employees on those grounds you’ve got to be willing to give ICE employees a pass too.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t see a reason to assume Facebook employees are, to a man, engaging in war crimes the way ICE officers are. Maybe some of them are pushing back against their overlords, like these Google employees.

          Now if it were to a man… Just yesterday I learned of a Mozilla employee vouching for their partnership with Anthropic, with suspiciously close timing to when Anthropic was used to justify the bombing of children in Iran.

          (cc Nomad@infosec.pub)

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s the company they keep and the crimes they enable with their support. You don’t have to be running the gas chambers to know what managing the punchcards is doing.

            I was a 6 figure FAANG level employee in the early aughts doing consulting/development, realized I was contributing to predatory lending, quit, and took a 15k a year teaching job overseas instead. If I’d not made that choice, I wouldn’t consider someone who held me personally responsible at some level for the financial crisis to be out of line.

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Using a tool versus helping develop one is a very strong distinction. It’s not great that they’re paying for Anthropic, obviously, but they’re also not contributing to Anthropic’s code base. If they were? They’d absolutely be complicit.

                The actual product Mozilla is building is still a net positive, or at least not negative, product to put into the world.

                Meta developers can make NO such claim. What they are actually MAKING is negative and destructive and they know it. It could not exist without their efforts. The fact another office decides what specific addictive algorithms to use is irrelevant.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Can you explain that last part about them being partly responsable for ICE? ICE has existed for a few years before Facebook was even founded, and they were also evil back then.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            They were evil but constrained and minor. Their current power is the direct result of the anti-immigrant flames social media like Facebook have been fanning with their algorithms for years.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          facebook is actually the first to do the most damage, by being one of the sole platform for russian backed propaganda to bring people into conservatism. boomers/gen x are the users.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        you don’t choose to work in a factory, but as a sw eng myself, you definitely choose to work in a faang corp. fuck the owning classes but remind the faang workers they’re trying to become the next owner and betraying the working class at the same time.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Only because they’re in a position to be. Lots of other companies/execs would literally kill to be in the same position. They’re not not pieces of shit out of the kindness of their hearts, it’s because they don’t have the power to be.

        • danciestlobster@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          While I do generally agree, there are a LOT of companies that have their own special kind of evil, and ultimately if people are choosing between being employed and working for one, they will work for one. There simply aren’t enough ethical jobs for the number of people who would prefer to work for ethical companies

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Its not a dichotomy. Its a spectrum. Meta, palantir they are at the bad end.

            Nobody working at facebook has any illusions that they work at a company that helps people make connections and express themselves online. They know its a manipulation machine that oversteps its boundaries, constantly, hoovering up their data. They are also well paid, so its not bread line or facebook. Its a choice.

            Many are starting to wake up, but the damage is done. So, its also perfectly reasonable for anyone to not feel sorry for them, if their choice to screw over the world ended up being less beneficial to them than they hoped. That doesnt mean they deserve vitriol or they had it coming.

            • 13igTyme@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The world isn’t black and white. I work for a company that’s been around for over a decade. We work with hospitals to improve operational efficiency. This leads to safer outcomes for patients, better working conditions for staff, and less wasted time or money.

              We recently signed a limited contract with palantir for a certain software data structure. It’s limited the very specific things. I’m not happy about the contract, but I’m still proud of what I do. I’ve been in different hospitals with and without our company. It’s a big difference and it can literally save lives.

              Should I quit then spend months looking for a new job in an economy currently with a very high unemployment rate just because someone online thinks the world is black and white?

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                lol, what part of saying it’s a spectrum makes you think it’s black and white. We all make decisions based on our interest, and we all have a line. You seem to have gotten closer to yours.

            • UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Couple things.

              Firstly; just because they are well-paid does not imply they have the means to survive without employment. In fact that places them far closer to you and I than to somebody capable of living solely off the labor of others. Additionally, large tech companies utilize H1B visas as a form of coercion for both the visa holder and the other employees.

              Secondly; you open your first paragraph with

              Nobody working at facebook has any illusions

              But open paragraph #2 with

              Many are starting to wake up

              Those two statements contradict each other.

              That’s not my point, though! My point is; blame the goddamn reptilian tech bro billionaire and the shareholders. Blame the government that allows Meta to exist at all. Blame the dysfunctional and cancerous-at-best socioeconomic systems that allow either to exist.

              Or, to put it more succinctly; don’t hate the player, hate the game.

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Being aware it’s not what they present themselves as is not the same as realising you’re helping fascists and genocides.

    • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You do realize that the problem is that people need money? Yea, many would likely have a choice where to work but many might Not have had options.

      What is needed is financial basic freedom for everyone. Countries need to sit down and figure out how to make it work because as it stands, jobs have turned into a form of slavery by design.

      • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s bullshit. Almost all meta hires are poached, and they’re not coming for you if you’re not in a position to make good money.

        The vast majority of these people chose to leave an already cushy job to get in there.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean if I worked for a soul sucking corporation (pick one Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, etc.) and another shitty corporation (Meta) offered me a substantial pay raise why wouldn’t I take it?

          Isn’t that the issue? We’ve created a system where you need money to live, and basically if you buy food and have a place to live you contribute to a system of exploitation.

          • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean if I worked for a soul sucking corporation (pick one Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, etc.) and another shitty corporation (Meta) offered me a substantial pay raise why wouldn’t I take it?

            But that’s not the real scenario. Monstruous companies aren’t the only jobs around. There’s a bajillion smaller and more ethical companies that hire the same kind of profiles as Meta.

            Also the mega-corporations tend to not poach small fish from each other. Sure they’ll go after each other’s top performers but there’s a tacit agreement that “normal workers” are not fair game.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Clearly you have not been looking for a job lately. I’ve known people with experience and degrees that have been searching for like 6 months. It’s bad out there, especially for the tech industry.

              Idk why you want to fight the worker and not the corporations

              • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’ve known people with experience and degrees that have been searching for like 6 months

                If that is the case then Meta probably won’t touch their resume with a 10-ft pole.

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Right so now you’ve taken 2 steps back. It’s not more moral to work for any other corporation that meta is poaching either.

                  Is it more moral to work for Amazon? Microsoft? Walmart?

                  Not really. The worker should try to improve their material condition since that’s the position we’ve all been put in.

                  You suggest everyone go work for a “small buisness” when those jobs simply don’t exist.

                  I don’t know why you are trying to shame the worker for trying to survive in the system.

                  Fun fact btw Walmart and Amazon are the 2 largest employers in the US. I suppose all their workers should quit and go work for Bob’s Bait & Tackle down the road. I’m sure he has about 3 million jobs just lying around

        • jve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          almost all Meta hires are poached

          You think they poached “almost all” of their 80k employees?

          • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s kind of standard practice at this level. They get a million resumes a week in inbound, of which they hire very little, and they have an army of recruiters who go searching for people in the industry, who for the most part already have a job.

            It’s way more profitable to let small startups grow juniors into competent employees and pluck them when they’re ripe, than to take risks on junior profiles. (not that i condone it but it’s a sad truth of recruitment)

        • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You do know that meta doesn’t only have high level jobs, right? There cannot just be middle managers everywhere without the bog standard workers.

          What kind of perception do you have of tech giants? That all who work there are some kind of imaginary elite?

          • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            meta doesn’t only have high level jobs

            The majority of their hires are experienced profiles. “Bog standard” worker in Meta is already a pretty high paying job as entry level work is massively outsourced.

            all who work there are some kind of imaginary elite?

            That’s not at all what i’m saying. I’m saying if you can land a job at Meta then you can absolutely find a job elsewhere. There is nobody in the world who is stuck between an empty belly and accepting a position at Meta. They’re just stuck between making good money somewhere, and making better money at Meta.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Noooo everyone at meta is making at minimum 300,000 a year.

            They poach their janitors

            • leoj@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I would imagine their janitors don’t actually work for meta, but are provided via a complex web of contracts that helps them pay the janitors as little as possible, while enriching a middle man who does… little…

              • Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Exactly. Mega corps don’t touch entry level work, they do exactly as you say and pay a friend of theirs so that this friend can steal wages from poor people and guarantee them floor-level prices.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Countries need to sit down and figure out how to make it work because as it stands, jobs have turned into a form of slavery by design.

        Yeah, they already did that, and “slavery by design” is what they came up with.

        The next time, we don’t consult our country, we force them to do what WE want.

      • bonenode@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dunno man, there is nothing they do at Meta that is in anyway considered “good”, or is there?

        I mean, looking at the recent posts about ICE hiring with bonus, you’d think taking that offer is also fine when you need money?

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They certainly think they do a lot of good. We sit off in the distance reading the latest Reddit threads about whatever latest outrage has happened, and it looks all negative to us. But from their point of view they are serving 3 billion people’s needs to connect and network.

          I’m not saying I see it that way. But you seem to imply that they all know they work for an Evil Empire but they truly don’t see it that way. There are a lot of young people there who don’t look past the cachet of working for a well known and successful company. And there are wiser ones who genuinely believe the good outweighs the bad.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Meta is largely the reason for the current state of the world via their purposeful boosting of alt-right talking points. They’ve helped incite a genocide ffs. They’re not actively on the streets shooting people but this is what the company pushed for

            I’m not American but I am in tech and have been unemployed since January and even though my financial situation is grim, Meta and Palantir are two companies I would never, ever work for or even apply to. There’s always plenty of other companies to apply to (which is what I did and I start somewhere tomorrow!)

          • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            There’s no difference when the tech company is used to push propaganda supporting the SS and the workers don’t stand up to it. They are complicit and therefore responsible.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      One thing to note is Facebook bought a ton of other companies. So some of those people didn’t choose to work there at all they just stayed because they needed to keep their job. Some may even be trapped by circumstances like visas or medical needs. Companies don’t only screw over their users. They buy people and screw them too.

    • gurty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Really depends on if it is c-suite or the cleaners tbh.

      I’m not gonna say ‘Fuck wendy the cleaner who desperately took the first job available to support her sick mother’.

      Fuck the brass tho, obvs.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I saw an interview with some anonymized meta employees and all of them knew they were doing fucked up stuff. Then they said they were doing it for the stocks the company give them after x years worth millions.

      So yeah, fuck them.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      When the billionaires own everything you have no choice to work anywhere else.

  • DrSoap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    All these companies bragging about AI is just synonymous with how little they care about people.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine you are so dumb, you decide to rename your company for its biggest failure, and then you get to fire everybody else because they are redundant. Facebook renaming itself Meta is like Tesla changing its name to Cybertruck Inc.

    I can’t wait until the AI bubble is over and drags the worst people under.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      i think meta largely survives because they got people addicted to instagram, FB via propaganda, and now whatsapp. if it was just solely FB they have, it wouldve been a different sotry.

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is AI the final bubble they’ll inflate? Usually some new tech gets hyped when the old tech fails. See the progression through deep learning, Blockchain, NFT. Or will they do robotics and suddenly it’s robots everywhere. Maybe quantum computing.

        • billwashere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah. I mean blockchain is sorta resource intensive but more distributed. Crypto is basically the same thing. AI requires gigawatts of power, is disrupting almost every tech based manufacturing, uses tons of natural resources. All to create terrible content, hallucinate completely made up answers, and automate things to destroy themselves. Great idea guys.

          Do get me wrong, I’m not totally against AI. I think it can be a useful tool especially if sandboxed and run locally. But these giant data centers sucking up all the electricity and water are just no bueno.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Quantum computing will only be useful to a handful of people instead of mass consumer use. Quantum computers are mainly for cybersecurity.

        • TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Quantum processors are already a thing. I dont think we’ll see quantum powered consumer products for a while but I think they will eliminate the need for massive data centres and should be way better for the environment.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I dont think we’ll see quantum powered consumer products for a while

            Or ever. Quantum processors have to operate close to 0k to work

            • felbane@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Idk, Miles Dyson was able to engineer a neural-net processor with room temperature superconductors all the way back in 1995…

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                When it comes to tech, id never say never.

                Eh, there is a degree to that, but there’s also the fact that you can’t just break thermodynamics. With quantum effects you need to remove a lot of noise, and near-0k temperatures will do that.

                Not only that, is there even a practical purpose to getting quantum computing on an individual level? While it’s better for specialized problems, current transistor tech is way better at general use cases and is good enough that we don’t really need significantly more power. And even if it was technologically possible to shrink dpwn quantum computing enough to fit in a desktop of phone, what’s going to be the cost of it compared to transistors?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d kind of expect more than that.

    Meta’s said that they’re going to to be shifting focus from VR to AI.

    It looks like Meta’s VR wing employs 15,000 people:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Labs

    Number of employees: 15,000 (2026)

    Though…hmm. It says that there are some AI things under that as well, so maybe that’s not all VR:

    Reality Labs, formerly Oculus VR, is a business and research unit of Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook Inc.) that produces virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) hardware and software, including virtual reality headsets such as the Quest, and online platforms such as Horizon Worlds. In June 2022, several artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives that were previously a part of Meta AI were transitioned to Reality Labs.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Given that the Metaverse stuff hasn’t been commercially successful thus far, burning a lot of money.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have a Quest headset, and I have no idea. But of course I don’t want anything to do wih their “metaverse”, so I would’t be able to see where most of their work went.

        What I can tell you is the parts I did use, like the system UI and app store, are complete shit and never improved one bit through the years.

        The app store is especially terrible for a company with those resources. It’s using the worst machine translation I ever saw (forget LLMs, this is a lot worse than 2010 google translate). It has terrible search and discoverability options for a store that has comparatively so little content.

        Whenever I find something interesting in it, it’s also regularly failing transactions with a major bank in my country. I’m almost listing that as a pro since it discouraged me to get stuff from a headset-locked store that will be completely abandoned very soon.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok, but if you work for ZuckerDork (or anyone like him) and get laid off then I have no sympathy. None at all.
    You were and are part of the problem. The end.

    In fact, getting laid off is far better than what I wish for you.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So? Maybe I’m weird, but I don’t have the moral intuition that an employer generally ought to keep employing people if it can afford to.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      i do when the goal is instead to pay shareholders. the corp should pay emps first or go on to fail. fuck shareholders.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s that Meta treats every human it engages with as an object to extract value from: customers, users, employees.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is this the technology forum or fuckai/fuckwork/fuck meta forum.

    Jesus H Christ

    I understand those are popular positions for the average Lemmy user but the negativity is really off-putting

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s cause nothing good is coming out of those tech companies. All they ever do now is make things worse for the users AND for people who aren’t even users at all. Fuck them all to hell and back.

    • greybeard@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s part of my day job to keep up with tech news, and these days there isn’t a news story about tech that isn’t all about AI. The good, the bad, the ugly, it’s all AI all the time. Even hyper specific industry news that should be all about M&A and product launches is just all AI as well (when it isn’t just “CEO Says” articles, most of which are just more AI BS).

      When a new company has something to announce that isn’t AI, they will sandwich it between two AI announcements just to get the views and placate the investors.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        AI is the buzz at the moment and is driving investment. From the perspective of the business of selling tech it matters most.

        But that’s largely because companies involved in tech are trying to find use cases for AI that can move the needle, as is the case for many new technologies in search of a problem to solve.

        If the starting position is “fuckai” or “fuckwork”, or “fuckzuck”, well I guess thats awesome but doesn’t really seem like a conversation about tech or how it may eventually solve problems or change the world.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          almost all the tech conference schedules around us are peddling AI in one form or another, they mostly abandoned other forms of tech that are actually useful. i see alot of things falling apart after it bursts.

          • nucleative@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Do you feel like AI and its current form is ever going to go away?

            To me it seems like we’re well beyond the point of it going away ever. It may never live up to the hype of replacing all the jobs.

            We also know that AI companies are footing a large chunk of the bill. Someday those prices are going to crank up and a bunch of work we shovel over to AI will go back to humans.

            Heck, it may have peaked already - we may not have any more killer uses to discover. Or maybe we do, and that’s partly why I’m here - I’m pretty interested to see if some interesting uses cases emerge. Some really tough or annoying problem that we all hate to do that AI can start actually doing really good work at.